2170Re: [XSL-FO] Common sense vs. verbatim interpretation of the specification
- Aug 24 5:38 AMAt 2002-08-24 08:05 +0500, David Tolpin wrote:
> > >If the spec means that basic-link should propagate hot areas to allWhy not? But I take your point, and it is a good one. Indeed one could
> > >_contained_ areas, not just to _containing_ ones, then it should
> > >be worded as such,
> > Yet so many in the industry are expecting the entire contents of the basic
> > link to be hot (i.e. the contained areas) and not just the basic link
> > the containing area).
>Should footnotes anchored inside a basic-link be hot?
make the argument for only normally flowed areas, but again only based on
common sense and not on the reading of the specification.
I'm anxious to see what the errata will have to say (as yet empty):
Upcoming hands-on in-depth 3-days XSLT/XPath and/or 2-days XSL-FO:
- North America: Sep 30-Oct 4,2002
- Japan: Oct 7-Oct 11,2002
G. Ken Holman mailto:gkholman@...
Crane Softwrights Ltd. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/f/
Box 266, Kars, Ontario CANADA K0A-2E0 +1(613)489-0999 (Fax:-0995)
ISBN 0-13-065196-6 Definitive XSLT and XPath
ISBN 1-894049-08-X Practical Transformation Using XSLT and XPath
ISBN 1-894049-07-1 Practical Formatting Using XSLFO
XSL/XML/DSSSL/SGML/OmniMark services, books (electronic, printed),
articles, training (instructor-live,Internet-live,web/CD,licensed)
Next public training: 2002-08-26,27,09-30,10-03,07,10,12-08
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>