2168Common sense vs. verbatim interpretation of the specification
- Aug 23, 2002At 2002-08-13 01:45 +0500, David Tolpin wrote:
>this problem is not the only one in the current Recommendation.Yet some implementations choose to not do property inheritance "through"
>The fact that common sense contradicts with the word of the document
>should not draw implementors from following the XSL FO Recommendation;
>the path of common sense leads to troubles way mor often than it seems
certain constructs, such as footnotes, which I understand the specification
For example, if I have a footnote in an indented block, then the blocks of
the footnote inherit that indent and the footnote must reset the indent to
ensure the block isn't indented at the bottom of the page.
Two commercial implementations that are available right now produce
different results because of the choices of "common sense" vs. "verbatim
interpretation of the specification".
>If the spec means that basic-link should propagate hot areas to allYet so many in the industry are expecting the entire contents of the basic
>_contained_ areas, not just to _containing_ ones, then it should
>be worded as such,
link to be hot (i.e. the contained areas) and not just the basic link (i.e.
the containing area).
Can someone on the XSL committee comment on whether the basic-link
controversy is perhaps an erratum that hasn't yet been published?
Upcoming hands-on in-depth 3-days XSLT/XPath and/or 2-days XSL-FO:
- North America: Sep 30-Oct 4,2002
- Japan: Oct 7-Oct 11,2002
G. Ken Holman mailto:gkholman@...
Crane Softwrights Ltd. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/f/
Box 266, Kars, Ontario CANADA K0A-2E0 +1(613)489-0999 (Fax:-0995)
ISBN 0-13-065196-6 Definitive XSLT and XPath
ISBN 1-894049-08-X Practical Transformation Using XSLT and XPath
ISBN 1-894049-07-1 Practical Formatting Using XSLFO
XSL/XML/DSSSL/SGML/OmniMark services, books (electronic, printed),
articles, training (instructor-live,Internet-live,web/CD,licensed)
Next public training: 2002-08-26,27,09-30,10-03,07,10,12-08
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>