2149RE: [XSL-FO] line-height of a basic-link around an
- Aug 12, 2002
>>However, the problem is real - I concur that in David Cramer's case,is
>>XEP's behaviour is far from intuitive. Maybe we should ask authors
>>of the XSL spec?
>I am interested to hear their response, as I am still of the mind there
>an interpretation that can allow for the entire graphic to be hot.It would also be in keeping with the type of links that most people
would be familiar with, i.e hyperlinking in html.
It would be compatible with simple XLink.
I have a hard time seeing how it would be a useful feature that links
behaved in this manner, unless it were for the purpose of defining
hotspots for images, which could be achieved via other ways - although
granted each one that I can think of would have an ugly hack feel to
If anyone can think of how such behavior would be a useful feature
At any rate given
http://www.w3.org/TR/xsl/slice1.html#section-N1044-Linking refers to
html linking for formatting of a link, and XLink for the semantics of
following a link, and given(if indeed you would give this) that the
section above seems to be an abstract description of intended meaning of
what linking is in XSL-FO then I think Ken is right here.
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>