Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

WBCSD background - Economist article on industry challenges: # 1

Expand Messages
  • eric.britton@ecoplan.org
    Dear Friends, This is a part of a small set of current background articles taken from recent editions of The Economist which I share with you today as part of
    Message 1 of 1 , Sep 8, 2004
      Dear Friends,

      This is a part of a small set of current background articles taken from
      recent editions of The Economist which I share with you today as part of
      the run-up to our final views and recommendations in the month or so
      ahead stemming from our joint consideration of the ill-fated (my term,
      but really above all ill-titled) WBCSD report on "Mobility 2030: Meeting
      the Challenges to Sustainability".

      The objective of this "data dump" is to make sure that we have a firm
      handle on who they are and what preoccupies them as we grind into this
      new and challenging for everybody century. I have always found The
      Economist an interesting and generally pretty honest source of
      information and perspective on these matters of technology and economy
      (and society). Much of the content of what follow will be well known to
      most of you, but perhaps it will be useful as a reminder in our present

      After all, the sponsors of the report are, they must be part of the
      solution. And for that they need a bit of help. So perhaps our
      ambitious assignment is to use our considerable joint reputations and
      capacities for education and persuasion to give them a better idea of
      how they can become part of the solution - and perhaps deal with some of
      their most pressing problems and priorities in the process.

      Cause if we don't do it, who will? Eh?

      Eric Britton


      From The Economist, Sep 2nd 2004


      For much of the 20th century, carmaking was the "industry of
      industries". Now it has to reinvent itself, says Iain Carson

      IT MAKES nearly 60m cars and trucks a year, and employs millions of
      people around the world. Its products are responsible for almost half
      the world's oil consumption, and their manufacture uses up nearly half
      the world's annual output of rubber, 25% of its glass and 15% of its
      steel. No wonder the car industry accounts for about 10% of GDP in rich

      But the industry that has pioneered the forms and weathered the storms
      of 20th-century capitalism is now over 100 years old, and it is
      struggling. Average profit margins have declined from 20% or more in
      its youth in the 1920s to around 10% in the 1960s and less than 5% now,
      and some volume carmakers have actually been losing money. Despite its
      importance to modern economies, the industry has all but vanished from
      equity markets. "It is becoming a sunset industry, a has-been in
      financial terms--a flagrant contrast with its continuing social role,
      its share of employment and its political influence," write Graeme
      Maxton and John Wormald in a new book, "Time for a Model Change".

      A study by Deutsche Bank two years ago found that the car industry
      represented just 1.6% of Europe's stockmarket capitalisation, and only
      0.6% of America's. Two decades earlier, the figures were 3.6% and 4%
      respectively. Although firms such as Ford dominate the corporate-bond
      market, the car companies' debt is rated as close to junk, so they have
      to pay dearly for this kind of finance. In Japan the picture is
      different because of the unusual success of the world's mightiest
      carmaker, Toyota, and (latterly) the recovery of Nissan under the wing
      of Renault.


      A century ago the car industry more or less invented modern industrial
      capitalism. The car started life in Germany, and early development of
      the industry began in France (hence automobile, originally a French
      word) in the 1900s, but it was in America that it came of age. Henry
      Ford's adaptation for carmaking of the moving assembly line he had seen
      in Chicago slaughterhouses marked the birth of mass production.

      But Mr Ford applied those techniques to a vehicle that resembled a
      horse-drawn carriage, with a body laid on to a separate chassis. Modern
      cars have a monocoque steel body in which the strength is built into
      the pressed steel floor, sides and roof. It was invented by Edward
      Budd, taken up by Dodge and then by Citroen in Europe, and then by all
      volume carmakers.

      Toyota may have refined the process in the 1960s by its
      lean-manufacturing (just-in-time) techniques, but cars are still made
      by stamping, welding and dipping steel, then stuffing the body with
      engine, trim and seats. Factories have to be large to reap the biggest
      economies of scale: around 250,000 units a year for assembly plants and
      1m-2m units for making body panels. So Mr Budd's legacy was not only a
      way of making a rigid integral car body; he also laid the foundations
      for a whole rigid industry that some experts think is now incarcerated
      in its own vast plants.

      Around the same time as modern car manufacturing was born in the
      mid-1920s, Alfred Sloan's ideas for running General Motors provided the
      model for the great corporations that grew up to dominate the second
      half of the 20th century. GM soon swept past Ford as Mr Sloan
      revolutionised the young car industry, and Ford has never regained the
      dominance it enjoyed in the infancy of mass production.

      The car industry has been ahead of its time in many respects. Peter
      Drucker, a management writer who first made his name with a study of GM
      in 1945, coined the phrase "industry of industries". The company was
      also the leader in "planned obsolescence", the frequent changes in
      design that tempted customers to switch to a new model every year or
      so. It was the first to feel consumer anger, with the publication in
      the 1960s of Ralph Nader's attack on the safety record of the Big Three
      Detroit manufacturers, "Unsafe at Any Speed". In the 1970s, as the oil
      price quadrupled, the industry found itself under attack from
      environmentalists outraged by its products' gas-guzzling habits.

      It was also among the first to come under careful government scrutiny,
      from safety concerns to environmental issues to antitrust worries in
      the days when General Motors had 60% of its domestic market and could
      snuff out competitors with a few well-chosen price cuts. But it also
      received more welcome government attentions. When small, economical and
      reliable Japanese cars started to eat into Detroit's market share, the
      American government imposed restraints on those imports. Soon
      afterward, the industry in Europe came under similar pressures.

      The car industry also found itself at the cutting edge of capitalism in
      another sense. As mass production techniques developed in the 1920s and
      1930s, its workers increasingly pushed for unionisation. At times, it
      seemed as though the car factories of the Detroit area, the British
      Midlands or the huge plants around Paris were the main battleground of
      the class war. Even today, the United Auto Workers union (UAW) still
      dominates Detroit, even though trade union membership in America's
      private sector as a whole is well below 10% of the workforce.

      Until last year the UAW's leadership seemed to have its head in the
      sand, oblivious to the competition that was hurting General Motors,
      Ford and the Chrysler end of DaimlerChrysler. Then it suddenly got the
      message, agreed to a moderate pay deal and accepted more closures. The
      union has seen its membership decline steeply over the past 20 years,
      but it can still make it hard for car companies to reduce overcapacity.

      Today the motor car is the epitome of mass production, mass marketing
      and mass consumption, with some of the strongest brands in the world.
      For most households in rich countries, it is the second-biggest
      purchase after a house or flat. Few other consumer-goods industries
      depend so heavily on a thriving second-hand market for their products.
      And yet there are powerful forces at work that could profoundly change
      the industry.

      One is the fragmentation of the market, leading to lower production
      runs. Another is dissatisfaction with the costly system of building
      cars for stock, not to order. A third is innovative modular
      construction, in which more of the car is put together by parts
      suppliers. And further ahead, a fourth force could be a switch to
      electric cars with electronic and electrical rather than mechanical


      Right now, though, the biggest force for change is the fact that most
      of the volume-car industry is broke and needs fixing. The market in
      America, Europe and Japan, where over 80% of the world's cars and
      trucks are sold, has been running out of growth. In America the arrival
      of European, Japanese and South Korean makers has created overcapacity.
      Moreover, as America's own carmakers constantly improve their
      productivity to catch up on these new rivals, their greater efficiency
      itself increases capacity by about 3% a year.

      In Germany and France, rigid labour laws have inhibited the closure of
      redundant old factories, although Renault has set a good example, and
      Ford Europe and GM Europe have been trying to follow it. In Japan, the
      close industrial partnerships known as KEIRETSU have proved too rigid
      for some manufacturers. Only Toyota and Honda remain in purely Japanese
      hands. The smaller Japanese producers make little or no profit at home
      and are struggling to get into the black in Europe. Even for the big
      companies America provides the best hopes for growing profits.

      The rest of the world presents a mixed picture. In Asia the 1997
      financial crisis dealt the South Korean car industry--always a rather
      artificial creation--a huge blow. Today only Hyundai survives as an
      independent. In South America economic collapse in Brazil and Argentina
      put a stop to the rapid expansion of the car industries there, leaving
      foreign investors such as Fiat to cut their losses.

      The boom in China is getting everyone excited, but it needs to be kept
      in perspective. For all the huge percentage increases, the annual value
      of that market is equivalent to just about a month's sales in the rest
      of the world.

      All the car companies think that if only they try harder, they can
      somehow regain growth at the expense of rivals. But in reality they are
      like Scott Fitzgerald's "boats against the current, borne back
      ceaselessly into the past". Add the growing pension and health-care
      bills of traditional producers such as America's Big Three and the
      Europeans, and it is easy to see why the industry is feeling under

      See this article with graphics and related items at

      Go to http://www.economist.com for more global news, views and analysis
      from the Economist Group.


      Economist.com is the online version of The Economist newspaper, an
      independent weekly international news and business publication offering
      clear reporting, commentary and analysis on world politics, business,
      finance, science & technology, culture, society and the arts.
      Economist.com also offers exclusive content online, including additional
      articles throughout the week in the Global Agenda section.


      Click here:

      Subscribe now with 25% off and receive full access to:

      * all the articles published in The Economist newspaper

      * the online archive - allowing you to search and retrieve over 33,000
      articles published in The Economist since 1997

      * The World in 2004 - The Economist's outlook on 2004

      * The US Election 2004 - providing dedicated coverage of the election,
      including articles from Roll Call, Capitol Hill's leading political

      * Business encyclopedia - allows you to find a definition and
      explanation for any business term


      This e-mail was sent to you by the person at the e-mail address listed

      above through a link found on Economist.com. We will not send you any

      future messages as a result of your being the recipient of this e-mail.

      - COPYRIGHT -

      This e-mail message and Economist articles linked from it are copyright

      (c) 2004 The Economist Newspaper Group Limited. All rights reserved.


      Economist.com privacy policy: http://www.economist.com/about/privacy.cfm
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.