Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

"Or, practices for which we are struggling to find appropriate justification'

Expand Messages
  • eric britton
    I find that there is great good sense in this counsel from Paul Minett in the context of our on-going Worst Practices exchanges and examples -- and I
    Message 1 of 1 , Jul 20 12:41 AM
    • 0 Attachment

      I find that there is great good sense in this counsel from Paul Minett in the context of our on-going Worst Practices exchanges and examples -- and I definitely agree that it needs to be put up close to our main title (which I am utterly loatch to abandon).

       

      Thank you Paul.

       

       

      -----Original Message-----
      From: Paul Minett [mailto:paulminett@...]
      Sent: Wednesday, 20 July, 2011 02:21
      To: 'eric britton'
      Subject: RE: [sustran] A very short list of very bad practices

       

      Perhaps the title should not be 'worst practices' or even 'bad practices'

      but 'practices for which we are struggling to find appropriate

      justification'.  That would enable you to move the item to a different

      classification when (if) it turns out that they had a good plan all along.

       

      Paul Minett

      Raspberry Express

      www.raspberryexpress.com

      64 21 289 8444

      64 9 524 9850

       

       

      -----Original Message-----

      On Behalf Of eric britton

      Sent: Tuesday, 19 July 2011 9:03 p.m.

       

      I received a fair number of communications both on and off-line and I find

      them interesting, challenging, and generally very encouraging.  But at the

      same time I am made aware of the fact that I have most probably not

      communicated the basic goal behind this project, so let me see if I can now

      clarify a bit.

       

      For starters, this is not a witch hunt.  It is not my interest to castigate

      or humiliate any project or group behind it.  Life is complex and filled

      with all kinds of internal contradictions, and moreover the kinds of

      projects and policies that concern us here tend to be in process, in

      constant evolution and adaptation, until that is the day comes in which they

      close down forever.  That of course is the time to do a postmortem. But in

      our particular case here is my guess that we will be sharing information on

      projects in process, so let us make sure that we (that I) do not give up on

      possible adaptations and improvements that may well be in process,

      hopefully.

       

      And if the usual ambitious goal of Best Practices surveys and inventories is

      to get out there and capture quite a large number of attractive and

      instructive projects, it is not at all the case in our own modest Worst

      Practices mini project.  What I am looking for is one or two handfuls of

      outstanding from examples which we can learn.  Yesterday's article in World

      Streets on the Los Angeles Interstate 405 road widening project is a good

      case in point.  Let us take a minute to have a look at it together:

       

      Exemplary Strong points: (Always a good place to start since our goal is to

      see if we can have a balanced understanding of what is going on and what may

      have gone wrong.)

       

      .         Caltrans and the other players involved in this project are

      extremely good at what they do. 

       

      .         Not only are they world level performers when it comes to creating

      the planning and engineering standards to make a project like this work, but

      they also, in partnership with other players, consistently manage to do a

      fine job of bringing their projects in to standard and on time. 

       

      .         For those of us familiar with driving in LA, we can testify on an

      almost daily basis the manner in which the road crews get their job done,

      often within minutes of the plan and clean up the mess so that the traffic

      can start to roll.  ("The cones are up.")

       

      Exemplary weak points and commentary:

      1.  Oh dear. It is after all 2011 and if we have learned one thing about

      sustainable and on sustainable transportation over the last decades, it is

      that any project which extends the capacity of the infrastructure to carry

      yet more moving motor vehicles is a definite Worst Practice strategy.

       

      2.  The concept of creating HOV lanes in the place of what went before is in

      theory an excellent one, but in practice is often watered down and abused in

      a number of ways.  (Maybe somebody can explain to me in a convincing manner

      why electric vehicles or hybrid vehicles should be allowed with a single

      passenger on to HOV, and while I am ready to listen and whether you can pull

      a rabbit out of a hat that I have ever seen, I most doubtful that you will

      convince me or any other experienced independent observer.)

       

       

      3.  The articles' authors commentary concerning the limitations of

      carpooling as presently practiced in the region is, according to my best

      information, right on target.  Does this mean, however, that HOV lanes are

      not part of the solution?  Not at all!  But what it does mean is that the

      old ideas about how to do this need to be brought up to date.  So, if we

      were to think about it from this perspective, here we have a situation in

      which there is what looks like a potentially excellent hardware solution

      (i.e., converting portions of the existing road infrastructure to HOV lanes)

      needs to have better complementarity in terms of software and operations.

       

       

      4.  So, to summarize, they failed to do the whole job.  We have at the base

      of this project a good idea, well executed on the hardware side -- other

      than the fact that the project team made the old and now well known error of

      actually increasing infrastructure capacity for cars -- while for the rest

      they simply fail to give attention to the most important part of all --

      i.e., how to get more people into fewer cars with improved mobility and

      improved quality of life.  Basically they were taking an old mobility

      approach to a problem/opportunity that required new mobility strategic

      thinking.

       

       

      That is my take on this as an example of the sort of thing that I would like

      to see in our modest shared Worst Practices inventory and commentary.  I am

      sure that a number of you will come in and do more and better, at least I

      hope so.  But my reason for sharing this with you this morning is that I

      wish to offer this is an example of the kind of project analysis and

      commentary that I believe can help us to better organize our ideas and be

      better prepared for future initiatives and opportunities.

       

      I look forward to hearing from you either personally or here with your

      views, objections, and eventually your ideas and suggestions on the basic

      concept here namely , that of setting out to create a collaborative, open,

      independent Worst Practices inventory and commentary.

       

    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.