Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: WorldTransport Forum [World Streets] Slowth

Expand Messages
  • Heather & Kerry Wood
    Dear Eric A possible way forward: slowth is two different things. -- A concept of lower traffic speeds: part of the toolbox but not the Swiss Army knife. Here
    Message 1 of 2 , Mar 17, 2009
    • 0 Attachment
      Dear Eric

      A possible way forward: slowth is two different things.

      -- A concept of lower traffic speeds: part of the toolbox but not the Swiss Army knife. Here the wikikeepers have a point.

      -- A short and snappy name, absorbing 'growth' into 'slow', for a new paradigm to get cities out of their unsustainable rut.

      The new paradigm is still being developed but it is likely to include most of these:

      A new paradigm of slowing traffic
      Quality of life, wider choice
      Balanced emphasis on all modes
      Convenience for all (but not at the expense of inconvenience for others)
      A hierarchy of modes tailored to the city and area: walking, disabled access, bike, deliveries and so on
      Work on transit: maximising door-to-door trip speed is the main objective
      Visionary/tough political support
      Traffic evaporation
      Realistic economic evaluation
      A much lower priority for on-street car parks 
      Public health benefits (pollution, exercise, crashes, noise)
      Reassign road space (increases people-carrying capacity)
      Safe use of all modes: walk, cycle, transit, car, truck
      Limit vehicle access at peak-people hours
      Response to climate change and oil scarcity
      Identifying car dependence
      Public levies on commercial parking
      Public bikes
      Planning, consultation and promotion

      Some questions for World Transporters
      Are you willing to adopt slowth? 
      Does your spell-checker recognise it?
      Will you put it in the key-words of your next paper, on any of the topics above?

      A parallel approach is to re-write the wiki entry to cover some of these points, with references to each.

      Kerry Wood

      On 15/03/2009, at 6:37 AM, ericbritton wrote:

      This entry is offered here as a sort of movable feast. Rough and ready at this point, it can be greatly improved, both here and in the Wikipedia entry which I hope you will junp in on to do your bit.
      To win the war of new mobility, sustainable development and social justice, we need to change to vocabulary which, heavily encumbered with the luggage of the past, conspires to lock us in to the old way of thinking, speaking, and ultimately doing things.

      If we are to be up to the sustainability challenges and the behavior changes that necessarily go with them of this difficult 21st century turning point, we are going to have to redraw the lines of the court and develop a vocabulary that reflects the necessary lucidity of thinking needed to break the impasses. Otherwise for sure are going to find ourselves once again in a lose/lose situation.

      Here then is one word which I have been proposing and using, largely without success, the better part of a decade and I put it before you with a certain pride: slowth. About two years ago I created a Wikipedia entry for it, however I have been challenged because the entry lacks references and hence is subject to eventual removal, The gamekeepers over there suggest that “the best way to address this concern is to reference published, third-party sources about the subject”. Fair enough.

      So my question to you is that, if you have a feel for the concept, can you possibly take the time to go in and make it a more solid reference? The text presently reads like this (below):

      Slowth (From Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slowth)

      Slowth is a transport planning concept, usually deployed in congested urban environments, where transport is calibrated for lower top speeds, but the result is shorter overall travel times across the entire system.[1]
      The concept of slowth is sometimes compared to the story of The Tortoise and the Hare; the paradoxical notion that slowing the top speeds of transport will when properly engineered allow more people to get to their destinations more quickly. An example is that where there is sufficient traffic congestion, a bicycle may get to its destination more quickly than say a Ferrari. When a city adopts a policy of slowth, the top speeds will be lower, but congestion decreases because the slower speeds result in steadier traffic flow.[1]

      This is a powerful model which urban planners and traffic engineers, with a few notable exceptions, are only recently starting to take seriously. An important new mobility concept, it is also referred to as "slow transport".

      In the report "Speed Control and Transport Policy" (Chapter 10, on speed limits in towns, Policy Studies Institute, 1996) Mayer Hillman and Stephen Plowden describe an experiment in Växjö, a Swedish town of 70,000, which showed very small time penalties arising from some fairly substantial speed reductions at 20 junctions. The Swedish researchers used the results to simulate what would happen if similar speed-reducing measures were introduced at 111 junctions throughout the town and concluded that there would probably be a small net time saving. [2]

      In recent years it has gotten steadily increasing attention both in the literature but above all as part of the on-street sustainable transport strategies of a growing number of leading programs and projects around the world (See listing below).

      1 Proponents
      • John Adams, United Kingdom.
      • Donald Appleyard, United States.
      • Eric Britton, France
      • Dan Burden, USA
      • David Engwicht, Australia
      • Jan Gehl, Denmark
      • Ben Hamilton-Baillie, United Kingdom.
      • Mayer Hillman, United Kingdom
      • Hans Monderman, The Netherlands
      • Peter Newman. Australia
      • Stephen Plowden, United Kingdom

      2. See also
      • Cittaslow (Slow cities movement, in English)
      • Home zones
      • Livable Streets
      • New Mobility Agenda
      • Pedestrian#Pedestrianisation
      • Public space management
      • Road traffic control
      • Shared space
      • Slow movement
      • Street hierarchy
      • Sustainable transportation
      • Traffic calming
      • Walkability
      • Walking
      • Woonerf
      • World Streets

      3 References
       Disappearing traffic? the story so far. London: Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, Municipal Engineer, Paper 1272, March
       The paradox of congestion., Wood, K (2007). In IPENZ Transportation Group Conference, Tauranga, New Zealand 10-10-2007
       Speed Control and Transport Policy, Policy Studies Institute, London, 1966. Mayer Hillman and Stephen Plowden
       Gutman, Manisha (2008-02-03). "The Greening of Paris" (in English). The Hindu.http://www.hindu.com/mag/2008/02/03/stories/2008020350050400.htm. Retrieved on 2008-03-08.
       Effekten av Generell Hastighetsdampningt i Tatort - C Hyden, K Odelid, and A Varhelyi. Lund Institutionen for Trafikteknik, Pub: 1992

      4 External links
      • Wolmar, Christian, "Power to the pedestrian," The Independent, (London), Jun 17, 1996 

      Posted By ericbritton to World Streets at 3/09/2009 03:36:00 PM 

    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.