632Re: WorldTransport Forum Comment on WTPP Vol 12, No. 3
- Jul 24, 2006Hi,
A small contribution. We have to move (I suggest) from an energy/emissions
perspective on this to a wider "total impact" perspective. It is remarkable
that after 30 years or more of general debate about transport and
environmental impacts we still miss/downplay things like:
land take (and the impact of loss of land for transport infrastructure on
food production and biodiversity)
fragmentation (a tiny land take is a 100% change in character if it
physically divides and separates a formerly unified area)
landscape (see Ian McHarg)
noise (see excellent analyses from World Health Organisation)
fiscal matters (who says that spending billions on roads or high speed
trains is a good way to allocate resources against competing demands in
health care, education, poverty, pensions etc)
social justice (what proportion of our transport spending benefits the top
10% income band? We have some evidence in the UK that 30% of spending
benefits the top 10%)
children..are our transport systems and cities child friendly. Definitely
transport and health. is there a connection between the Uk with the highest
rate of child obesity in Europe and the highest rate of kids being taken to
school by car in Europe?
there is lots more!
energy and emissions are important but we have to be careful to factor in
very best wishes
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lee Schipper" <SCHIPPER@...>
To: <jay@...>; <WorldTransport@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2006 7:01 PM
Subject: Re: WorldTransport Forum Comment on WTPP Vol 12, No. 3
> I had a great ride on the Brisbane line in 2003 * I dont think there is a
simple way of measuring footprints * in Australia,
> China, India, the majority of electric power comes from coal. Is that
> Lee Schipper
> Director of Research
> EMBARQ, the WRI Center
> for Sustainable Transport
> Washington DC
> +1202 729 7735
> >>> jay@... 7/23/2006 1:27 PM >>>
> Hi Ken,
> What do you think about the Bus Rapid Transit system in Brisbane, AU?
> While I prefer rail, it seems that the BRT system offers a lot in the
> way of flexibility. Also, when running on the alternative fuels or even
> electricity, I believe it can be very clean in regards to emissions.
> Although I am not versed in the impact of roads. If anyone has any
> insight in regards to the impact of road building vs. rail construction
> (and also the effects of tunneling), I would be much appreciative.
> Jay Corrales
> Move San Diego Board of Directors
> San Diego, CA, USA
> Ken.Crispin wrote:
> > We would like to see more focus on rail rather than road, as it is the
> > much cleaner environmentally sustainable mode of transport that leaves
> > a smaller footprint on the environment also.
> > Ken Crispin. Project Manager.
> > Citizens Environmental Advocacy Centre In'c.
> > Napier. NZ.
> > clean.air@... <mailto:clean.air@...>
> The New Mobility/World Transport Agenda
> Consult at: http://NewMobiity.org
> To post message to group: WorldTransport@yahoogroups.com
> To subscribe: WorldTransportemail@example.com
> To unsubscribe: WorldTransportfirstname.lastname@example.org
> Yahoo! Groups Links
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>