134RE: [WorldTransport] Taxi deregulation
- Dec 23, 2002To Ed Thompson
MD Public Carriage Office
I've just received this from Robert in Australia.
I know we are doing the opposite and just licensing the private hire trade
but do we have any relevant info' we can send him?
If so, pls reply direct with a copy to me.
Vice-Chair, Transport for London
Windsor House. 42-50 Victoria Street. London. SW1H 0TL.
Tel: 020 7941 4200. Fax: 020 7941 4748
From: Eric Britton [mailto:eric.britton@...]
Sent: 23 December 2002 14:03
Cc: utsg@...; WorldTransport@yahoogroups.com;
NewMobility@yahoogroups.com; 'DL - Alt-Transp-Nomail Mailing List!';
Subject: [WorldTransport] Taxi deregulation
From: Footlickers@... [mailto:Footlickers@...]
Sent: Monday, December 23, 2002 1:55 AM
My name is Robert. I own a taxi in Canberra Australia. Our local government
is trying to convince our taxi company that deregulation is good. We have
yet to be persuaded. Do you have any information on deregulation with
regards the Spanish experience especially in Madrid and Barcelona. I'm also
interested in the shortcomings or good points relating to the taxi radio
system and how it can be improved. Perhaps you could email me at your
convenience? If I have contacted you by mistake and you cannot help me,
could you possibly pass my request on to the relevant person with a CC to
me? Thanks Robert
Paris, Monday, December 23, 2002
The best I can do for you today is to forward your request for help to
several groups with background in these matters. Which I am doing with this
Less usefully perhaps, I can also offer you the following brief comments
based on some years of studying and working with taxi issues, always in a
broader overall transport and community context. And often with an eye to
what we can do with better information and communications technology.
* When you hear the word deregulation, you do well to reach for your
evolver (sorry). Not least because enough of the experience with
deregulating transport over the last decade-plus has been extremely
disappointing, for a variety of reasons.
* As much as anything else, I would say that the problem resides in
the fact that all too often the approach taken is simplistic, mechanistic,
rhetoric-driven, and rushed. The results have largely born this out.
* I have looked in taxi operations in a couple of dozen places over
the years and on just about all of the continents, and I have to say that
upon reflection one of the words that comes not at the top of my list is:
flexibility. Not that the taxis themselves are not flexible - and indeed
this should be included in one of the underlying targets of anything we do
to change their guiding framework, i.e., more and not less flexibility --;
rather that the structures of ordinances and laws within which they perform
their functions tend to be stodgy and unnecessarily constraining.
* So, the goal has to be not to deregulate, but to improve, to create
(and how I hate the expression) win-win situations in which the owners,
drivers, their clients and the community all come out with big gains. And
indeed it is possible (though that has to be the topic of something a bit
more substantial than this off the cuff reply).
* The key to successful transportation policy is, has to be, deep
analysis and dialogue. Moreover, in the case of a public service function
such as taxis, the entire process of dialogue needs to be inclusive, broad
and probably slowish. This can prove irritating for go-getting politicians
and administrators looking to hold up the bull's ears and tail, but hey we
are looking at one of the older professions and in many cases the ordinances
governing them stretch back a couple of centuries, including, ironically, in
cities that have themselves not been around that long (as a result of
copycat regulation in the first place).
* You gotta know what you want as the bottom line. To me it seems
pretty simple: more taxis, more people in them, better wages for drivers,
increased earnings for the industry, greater accessibility for all, higher
priority in the traffic stream, better driver safety and working conditions,
more versatility, greater flexibility, and a greater contribution to the
community as a whole.
* One real enemy to avoid is that of sub-optimization on any score.
This has been the bane of transport policy and practice in the past, sector
by sector, and has almost invariably led to a situation of feeding further
decline and future problems, usually at enhanced scale and impact.
* One barrier we find in many places is that it is next too impossible
to organist demonstration or pilot projects to test out and prove new
approaches and principles. SO, if one of the handmaidens of so-called
'deregulation' is that the new context will permit more and better trial
projects, then someone is starting to do something right.
* Finally, let me share an opinion with you as to what is quite
possibly one of the worst ways of setting a new policy in this area: And
this is to hand the job over to some consultants (hey! I am a consultant)
who then work with vigor, timeliness and gratifyingly under the whip of
their public sector and political masters to come up with the answer
To conclude: You have to know what you want. And process is all.
Hope that helps.
The Commons __ technology, economy, society__
Le Frene, 8/10 rue Joseph Bara, 75006 Paris, France
Day phone: +331 4326 1323 Mobile: +336 80 96 78 79
24 hour Fax/Voicemail hotline: +1 888 677-4866
http://ecoplan.org/ IP Videoconference: 184.108.40.206
Email: ecoplan.adsl@... <http://www.ecoplan.org/> URL
The Journal of World Transport Policy and Practice
Consult at: http://wTransport.org <http://wTransport.org>
To post message to group: WorldTransport@yahoogroups.com
To subscribe: WorldTransportemail@example.com
To unsubscribe: WorldTransportfirstname.lastname@example.org
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> Terms of Service.
The contents of the e-mail and any transmitted files are
confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or
entity to whom they are addressed. Transport for London hereby
excludes any warranty and any liability as to the quality or accuracy
of the contents of this e-mail and any attached transmitted files. If
you are not the intended recipient, be advised that you have
received this e-mail in error and that any use, dissemination,
forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this e-mail in error please notify
This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept
for the presence of computer viruses.
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>