Re: [WorldCitizen] Re: nuclear-petroleum power
- 1)the u.s. has uranium reserves sufficient to supply
our electricity needs for 50,000 yrs.
2)petroleum reserves are debatable but the range of
the debate is hundreds of years vs. thousands of
years. at any rate there is no debate about coal- for
all practical purposes it might as well be considered
3)wind, solar,geothermal etc. are all good but they
are highly limited for one reason or another.
4)the energy "problem" is a question of political will
not one of engineering or science.
5)ALWAYS ask yourself "WHO PROFITS?".
--- ro-esp <ro-esp@...> wrote:
> Citeren Mark <parashakti108@...>:__________________________________________________
> > >R: As far as I know, the existing nuclear power
> plants will finish
> > the existing uranium reserves within 50 years.
> > -M: Not if *breeder* reactors are used - these
> produce more fuel
> > (plutonium) than they consume.
> How many of those exist, and work to content ? I
> know they're was one under
> construction just a day's walk from here, but it was
> turned into an amusement
> park long before it's building was complete. I don't
> remember why exactly.
> Could be the hugeness of the investment, the risk of
> proliferation (it creates
> weapons-grade nuclear material, doesn't it ?), or
> the amount of nuclear waste
> (even more than ordinary nuclear plants ?)
> We have several hundred years of
> > fission power. We have plenty of time to develop
> thermonuclear fusion.
> Even if that were true, and would succeed, it would
> centralise powerproduction
> (and the other kind of power) enormously
> > Solar and wind power are whimpy and expensive.
> What's "whimpy" ?
> > And they aren't as
> > ecological as nuclear - nuclear reactors can
> actually destroy nuclear
> > waste (pyroprocessing).
> please explain this pyroprocessing
> > >R: Crude oil may run out even sooner
> > -M: Nuclear powered methanol plants could be built
> over depleated oil
> > fields, coal beds, tar-sand beds, and oil-shale
> Why that ? To use the nucear energy to suck out
> what's left ?
> > Combined nuclear-petroleum could probably last
> several hundred years.
> Even if chinese and indian (bharat) industry and
> mobility become equal to
> those in todays USA ?
> groetjes, Ronaldo
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
U.S. JOINED RESOLUTION A/C.3/60/L.28
The United States has joined with other nations in a consensus statement on the resolution calling for one additional week of negotiations next year. We would like to thank U.S. officials for their support of the United Nations Disability Convention process and extend our appreciation to those of you who took the time to encourage the U.S. government to adopt this position.
Maria Veronica Reina
Center for International Rehabilitation
1900 L Street NW, Suite 500
Washington, DC 20036