122606Re: SOMETHING YOU WON'T SEE IN U.S. NEWS
- Jan 18, 2014(This post has not been checked for conformance to the WWP posting format. dH.)
"Americans for Truth" is about, unsupported allegations, with no concern for accuracy or facts!!!
From: AudioLaw <AudioLaw@...>
To: americansfortruth <americansfortruth@...>; kol656019 <kol656019@...>; almagors <almagors@...>; carpbear <carpbear@...>; rockysma1 <rockysma1@...>
Cc: mckinneyhunter2 <mckinneyhunter2@...>; shadyslife <shadyslife@...>; baywife <baywife@...>; num1mema <num1mema@...>; ducky4817 <ducky4817@...>; jmach499 <jmach499@...>; jmills9786 <jmills9786@...>; jimmybug <jimmybug@...>; vbboyd123456 <vbboyd123456@...>; ebuckner <ebuckner@...>; forgetaboutit1 <forgetaboutit1@...>; davidw1235 <davidw1235@...>; cougarden <cougarden@...>; tdietlin <tdietlin@...>; sergeantfreedom <sergeantfreedom@...>; judyfuller007 <judyfuller007@...>; dagoodguys <dagoodguys@...>; cbhensler <cbhensler@...>; hillbillytrailer <hillbillytrailer@...>; jgtea <jgtea@...>; scorpi0lady1 <scorpi0lady1@...>; chasnemo <chasnemo@...>; postherguy <postherguy@...>; hemilight <hemilight@...>; world-wide_politics <firstname.lastname@example.org>; arif12 <arif12@...>; phayes9402 <phayes9402@...>; mckinneyhunter <mckinneyhunter@...>
Sent: Fri, Jan 17, 2014 10:45 pm
Subject: Re: SOMETHING YOU WON'T SEE IN U.S. NEWS
In a message dated 1/17/2014 3:49:19 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, americansfortruth@... writes:
Can someone on this list send a note relaying this left-wing hatemonger's criminal past? I doubt he has the character to own up to it. - pl
Americans For Truth
Wow! "Criminal past?" But you want someone ELSE to establish that?
Is that what "truth" is to you? Stating as fact that some has a criminal past, BEFORE getting the research done?
I understand that the guy you are talking about is an irritating spammer, constantly changing his email address so that blocking him doesn't keep his noise out of the inbox. But spamming isn't, as far as I know, criminal.
And you're not talking about spamming, are you Peter? You claim that the spammer was a child predator:
" Hopefully he's no longer an active predator of children."
But you say that before saying: "Can someone on this list send a note relaying this left-wing hatemonger's criminal past?" Apparently admitting that you don't actually KNOW what his "criminal past" may be.
I have seen lots of posts claiming the spammer is a convicted criminal. But each time I have asked, posters like "Paul Dunk" (a KKKoward who admits that he is too scared to use his real identity) and Margaret Hemenway, the aging Tea Bagger "comfort woman", have admitted that they have no actual knowledge, they are just repeated rumors and accusations they heard from other Tea Baggers.
Is that what "Americans for Truth" is about, unsupported allegations, with no concern for accuracy or facts?
Isn't it bad enough that we have to put up with the spammer, and his endlessly changing addresses? Do we now have to put up with another grifter whose only real purpose is to milk the maximum in "donations" from the minimum of intelligence?
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>