Re: [WoodGas] Re: water in engine
- Well, looks like you know how to set it up. Maybe you could get a
patent on it? Regards, Jack F
Are only the Police entitled to self defense with a firearm?
<www.gunsmith.fuselier.com> East Texas
Monday, July 31, 2006, 9:46:38 PM, you wrote:
KW> The old tractors we used to use with WI had a bout a 2 gallon tank for the water strapped to the frame of the tractor right under the carb, They used an up draft carb, There was a small tube
KW> about about 1/4" that went down into the top of the water tank. The other end went into the metal air filter tube right below the carb. The air passing the tip of the tube pulled water up out of
KW> the tank and into the intake air. There was a small adjustable orffice on the end of the tube inside the air intake tube. You could adjust the amount of water that was pulled into the intake air.
KW> There was no way the water could have gotten into the engine unless the motor was running.
KW> It only pulled water in according to the speed of the engine and the amount of air being pulled in through the intake manifold. There was no way it would pull more water than what it was
KW> adjusted to use. It was a bery simple set up but it worked like a charm. It couldn't have used much water because that tank would run it from sunup till noon and still have at least a half gallon
KW> of water still in the tank. That is pulling it hard. Just pulling a light load the tank would run it all day without refilling.
We are on that common ground together, you do agreeing about it.
torsdag 10. aug 2006 kl. 02:37 skrev Donald H Locker:
> Dang. Here I thought you guys were agreeing. Not sure about what, but[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> I really thought you had found some common ground.
> Ken Williams wrote:
> > Have it your way. End of subject.
> > Ken
> > kenn johnsen <kennj@...> wrote:
> > You keep going on, we are made different, damn no we are born
> > different, that is our base, then come all the rest.
> > tirsdag 1. aug 2006 kl. 20:19 skrev Ken Williams:
> >>Hi Kenn,
> [major snippage]