Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: M42

Expand Messages
  • lubated
    Thanks very much!
    Message 1 of 8 , Dec 29, 2012
    • 0 Attachment
      Thanks very much!

      --- In William-Optics@yahoogroups.com, "astromfm" <eggerk@...> wrote:
      >
      > That's a beautiful image Ed. You've done a fabulous job of controlling the difference between the Trapezium and the fainter parts of the nebula. Great detail and well-controlled dynamic range.
      > ...Keith
      >
      > --- In William-Optics@yahoogroups.com, "lubated" <elubat@> wrote:
      > >
      > > Here's my try at M42. I'm pretty happy with the result, although the image seems to suffer from some tracking issues. I have not had any such issues with my current equipment; perhaps I did not lock everything down tight enough in the cold and ran into some flexure issues. Or maybe I was having too much fun watching the Geminid meteor shower at its peak that night, and not paying enough attention to the imaging. Anyway, here it is; acquisition information is under the photo. Thanks for looking
      > >
      > > http://tinyurl.com/bujc59d
      > >
      > > Ed
      > >
      >
    • emanuelchacim
      Damnnnnnn. Ed, ive just saw your image now! Thats awesome! You did it with the Flt 98? Superb, really excellent work! Congrats :) Emanuel
      Message 2 of 8 , Dec 30, 2012
      • 0 Attachment
        Damnnnnnn. Ed, ive just saw your image now! Thats awesome! You did it with the Flt 98? Superb, really excellent work! Congrats :)
        Emanuel

        --- In William-Optics@yahoogroups.com, "lubated" <elubat@...> wrote:
        >
        > Thanks very much!
        >
        > --- In William-Optics@yahoogroups.com, "astromfm" <eggerk@> wrote:
        > >
        > > That's a beautiful image Ed. You've done a fabulous job of controlling the difference between the Trapezium and the fainter parts of the nebula. Great detail and well-controlled dynamic range.
        > > ...Keith
        > >
        > > --- In William-Optics@yahoogroups.com, "lubated" <elubat@> wrote:
        > > >
        > > > Here's my try at M42. I'm pretty happy with the result, although the image seems to suffer from some tracking issues. I have not had any such issues with my current equipment; perhaps I did not lock everything down tight enough in the cold and ran into some flexure issues. Or maybe I was having too much fun watching the Geminid meteor shower at its peak that night, and not paying enough attention to the imaging. Anyway, here it is; acquisition information is under the photo. Thanks for looking
        > > >
        > > > http://tinyurl.com/bujc59d
        > > >
        > > > Ed
        > > >
        > >
        >
      Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.