7806Re: Which is better 105ed or 110 fluorite?
- Mar 9, 2006David,
I've used both. My review of the FLT in on CN in the CN reports
section. I'm working on a review of the 105.
If price is an object, the 105 is a nice scope, and I'm seeing some
very nice images coming out of it. If price is no object - the
FLT-110 takes no prisoners. Seriously - the sample I was shipped for
review had absolutly supurb optics, and competes with anything -
*anything* else on the market for visual use.
--- In William-Optics@yahoogroups.com, "David Moorhouse" <climber@...>
> I'm thinking of buying a WO ZS 105mm Triplet APO for use ONLY in
> astrophotography. I want to use a SBIG ST-2000 with a ten way filter
> wheel I'm thinking of the Astrodon filter set. I was thinking of using
> the 0.8x focal reducer to get the exposure times that bit lower as
> well. I will definetly be doing colour and false colour imaging.
> I have a dome housed mount at a fairly dark sky. It will be used as a
> piggyback on a C-14 fork mount as a second telescope. I have two top
> quality telescopes for visual use so don't really care about this
> Then I see this 110 fluorite APO at about twice the price.
> Am I going to actually see any improvement by spending twice the amount
> of money?
> Anyone who has played with both I really want to hear what you think.
> Either that or links to pics taken on both.
> Dave Moorhouse
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>