Here in the USA, we overpopulation activists are almost
universally cursed as abortionists by the right and eugenicists by the
left, leaving us little choice but to concentrate into localized
majorities and use MUNICIPAL government to fund contraception.
What limited success we have had has been with numbersUSA and the
right wing xenophobes, which has heightened our denunciations from the
left, but resulted in a winning anti-immigration majority. However we
are very aware that this coalition puts contraception and abortion at
risk even though they are far more cost-effective than hiring either
border guards or land-use planners. I think the best plan is to allow
contraception and abortion to be attacked and then break with the right
only when the moderates join the left in their defense. Meanwhile we can
back the xenophobes in cutting immigration and breeder subsidies and let
the left scream whatever they want in their helpless minority tirades
until they learn to prioritize contraception over multiculturalism.
has an excellent free fax system that always allows a PS statement and
modification, and I always include modifications to demand contraception
funding and exemptions for sterile and gay immigrants.
So our best national scale hopes are in simultaneous issue based
coalitions with the xenophobes and the feminists, but our REAL hope is
not national. It is with selected LOCAL governments where we are
concentrated and where we can concentrate further. However land use
planning hinders our ability to concentrate and so must be replaced by
contraception, which is far more cost-effective anyway.
Meanwhile, the only reason to vote for either major party is to more
evenly split and gridlock the legislature thus giving third party
candidates, like ours, the deciding vote.
PS I'm going to add one bit of advise to land-use planners to save
themselves from complete hostility by overpopulation activists. If they
would learn to limit the SIZE of homes rather than the NUMBER of homes,
thus limiting the amount of room for children in each housing unit,
land-use planners could at least stop actively causing overpopulation.
Re: Population boom inevitable, PM told
Posted by: "William Bourke" stablepopulation@...
Sat Nov 13, 2010 9:37 pm (PST)
Thanks for your interest in SPA and Australia.
From a personal viewpoint though, I must admit a few things do concern
In particular, your focus on immigration and the loss of Australian
culture, language, etc.
As a humble member of SPA, I am not aware that culture is an issue for
In Australia, some are trying hard to educate the public that the
population debate is not about immigration per se. Growing local, or by
immigration, is not sustainable. It will not make any difference what
culture is dominant in Australia if we irrecoverably overload our country
and the planet.
I am concerned that comments in Australia linking population and the
environment to culture and language will result in people criticising us
for using 'population' as a cloak. That wouldn't be helpful in my view.
Moms Asked to Return to School
Grant Funding May Be Available to Those That Qualify.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]