Re: 1812 Deserter punishments
- There was a study done on this for the American forces. The study was published in 1940
Here is the info:
Hare, John S. "Military Punishments of the War of 1812," The Journal of the American Military Institute, Vol. 4, No. 4 (Winter, 1940)
--- In WarOf1812@yahoogroups.com, peter monahan <petemonahan@...> wrote:
> Can one survive 300 lashes with a cat?
> Good question! [snip]
- When I asked my father about why he signed up in 1939 his answer was very simple, "because you did" a whole generation in the UK did because it was the right thing to do. Whether they still thought that in May 1945 (at least those who had survived) is perhaps a rather different question :)
On 3 Feb 2012, at 22:28, Ron wrote:
> When I asked my Grandad why he signed up for WW 1 and my Dad for WW II the answer was the same--for the adventure! Not KIng and country, not to oppose the godless Hun but simply for the adventure. Neiher wanted a job or signed up through economic necessity.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: peter monahan <petemonahan@...>
> To: warof1812 <email@example.com>
> Sent: Fri, Feb 3, 2012 1:41 pm
> Subject: RE: 1812 Re: Punishments
> Moderator says: [?]
> The Message:
> Squire wrotwe: "Was a good option if you were starving."
> Spot on, Squire! Certainly, not everyone who joined the Allied forces in 1939-40-41 did it solely because of a deep seated hatered for National Socialism. Three squares a day and a new brown or blue suit must have sounded pretty good to many of the men who hadn't worked [or eaten properly] in the Depression years. I also noted a few years ago one young lad who'd lost his job at Marks & Spencer and joined the British Army and died in Iraq. His pastor at homne referred tio him as 'an economic conscript', which I thought a very telling turn of phrase. Certainly a large number, of the grunts at least, who serve in the Canadian Foprces come from the less affluent parts of this great land.
> Peter Monahan
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]