- From: "Leonard E Heidebrecht" <lheidebrecht@...>
I heard something on the radio this morning about a woman in the
Kitchener Ont area, being injured by a musket ... the owner had all
his other firearms (which were safe and not involved) seized by the
Len, I thot you had left the planet! .... welcome back!
According to the Waterloo Record newspaper most of the seized guns
were modern weapons and that the one that blew up was a "flintlock
muzzle loading rifle" which she was helping to load by holding it. I
wonder if the Colonel would let us rankers have a lady to help us
"prime n' load" ?!?! :^)
- In reviewing my message #13236 below, I must admit I don't think it
is particularly appropriate to the discussion. Teddy was discussing
artillery. We are talking about muskets or rifles.
But I would say that the reproductions we use have modern
steel barrels of much greater strenght than the originals. And being
recent, have not suffered the depredations of time, neglect and
uncertain maintenance. Anyone using a 150 year old plus original in
re-enactment is an accident waiting to happen.
--- In WarOf1812@y..., "colsjtjones2000" <colsjtjones2000@y...> wrote:
> Teddy Roosevelt in his "The Naval War of 1812" mentions the
> of breech explosions of American forged guns, due to structual
> problems in American foundries. Doug
> --- In WarOf1812@y..., Angela Gottfred <agottfre@t...> wrote:
> > We needn't look to modern explanations (e.g. use of smokeless
> powder) for
> > exploding muskets. Sadly, I have found many fur trade accounts of
> > hands and arms as a result of exploding trade guns, c. 1800-1820.
> Why did
> > they explode? Presumably as a result of incorrect loading or weak
> > The same problems can occur today.
> > In haste,
> > Your humble & obedient servant,
> > Angela Gottfred