Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

3123Re: [V4Protocol] Re: 14.073

Expand Messages
  • Ron Wenig
    Mar 9, 2013
    • 0 Attachment
      I may have clicked the wrong thing.  I'll try connecting to you.

      Ron ny3j

      On 3/9/2013 6:17 PM, Pete Ferrand wrote:
       


      Hey Ron, you had a q5 signal here nr Chicago. Tried to call you but the connect request came through as connect request to CQ instead my or anyone's call.

      -Pete
      WB2QLL
      Somers, WI

      -----Original Message-----
      >From: Ron Wenig <rwenig@...>
      >Sent: Mar 9, 2013 5:12 PM
      >To: V4Protocol@yahoogroups.com
      >Subject: Re: [V4Protocol] Re: 14.073
      >
      >Hi guys, I just got in and saw the emails. I saw N4AY on 14105.515 dial
      >and connected to him. We connected but I didn't receive any data from
      >him. There seemed to be a couple of other stations close by. I'm in
      >Pennsylvania.
      >
      >Ron ny3j
      >
      >On 3/9/2013 5:56 PM, mike.k0ter wrote:
      >>
      >>
      >>
      >> --- In V4Protocol@yahoogroups.com
      >> <mailto:V4Protocol%40yahoogroups.com>, "POB" <bozo1945@...> wrote:
      >> >
      >> > It seems to me that the above frequency is shall we say polluted
      >> with many varities of digital modes and of course all stations pile in
      >> this small space leaving v4 in the same situation.
      >> >
      >> > I myself would suggest for all v4 activity to move up frequency on
      >> 20 meters into a quiet zone such as 14.107.5 to get away from the
      >> circus of digital modes.
      >>
      >> 14.107.5 is within the 14.1005-14.112 segment allocated by
      >> the FCC for automatically controlled stations and is used
      >> by WL2K stations. It might be better to choose a frequency
      >> above 14.112.
      >>
      >> 73, Mike, K0TER
      >>
      >>
      >


    • Show all 23 messages in this topic