3122Re: [V4Protocol] Re: 14.073
- Mar 9, 2013Hey Ron, you had a q5 signal here nr Chicago. Tried to call you but the connect request came through as connect request to CQ instead my or anyone's call.
>From: Ron Wenig <rwenig@...>
>Sent: Mar 9, 2013 5:12 PM
>Subject: Re: [V4Protocol] Re: 14.073
>Hi guys, I just got in and saw the emails. I saw N4AY on 14105.515 dial
>and connected to him. We connected but I didn't receive any data from
>him. There seemed to be a couple of other stations close by. I'm in
>On 3/9/2013 5:56 PM, mike.k0ter wrote:
>> --- In V4Protocol@yahoogroups.com
>> <mailto:V4Protocol%40yahoogroups.com>, "POB" <bozo1945@...> wrote:
>> > It seems to me that the above frequency is shall we say polluted
>> with many varities of digital modes and of course all stations pile in
>> this small space leaving v4 in the same situation.
>> > I myself would suggest for all v4 activity to move up frequency on
>> 20 meters into a quiet zone such as 14.107.5 to get away from the
>> circus of digital modes.
>> 14.107.5 is within the 14.1005-14.112 segment allocated by
>> the FCC for automatically controlled stations and is used
>> by WL2K stations. It might be better to choose a frequency
>> above 14.112.
>> 73, Mike, K0TER
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>