Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

1289RE: [V4Protocol] Re: V4 ARQ QRV now 10136

Expand Messages
  • Matt Zilmer
    Jul 4, 2011
    • 0 Attachment
      Same here.  I just installed the full 0.3.0.1 package, available on the Yahoo group Files section.  I doubt there is any difference between the TNC 0.3.0.1 "patch" and the newly installed program.

      Deme, I copied your connect requests and the program tried to complete the handshake.  After a while, your end gave up and there were no more responses.

      Seems to be some degree of incompatibility or perhaps levels are wrong at one or more stations.  I clearly heard VE7CRT and everything decoded correctly in the TNC.

      73,

      Matt Zilmer, W6NIA / NNN0UET / NNN0GAF THREE
      NMCM RMS Winmor: NNU9ET-5: Upland, CA.




      To: V4Protocol@yahoogroups.com
      From: deme@...
      Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2011 16:13:45 +0000
      Subject: [V4Protocol] Re: V4 ARQ QRV now 10136

       
      ADDITIONAL INFO.
      My versions are: V4Chat 0.3.0.1 and V4 Sound Card TNC 0.3.0.1
      Deme, VE7CRT

      --- In V4Protocol@yahoogroups.com, "Deme" <deme@...> wrote:
      >
      > I heard responses to my ARQ CQ but no printing. Just brown gibberish with a line through it.
      > On receive frame got V4ARQ CRC Fail on the V4 sound card TNC.
      > When switched to FEC got the following: V4FEC CRC Fail on the V4 Sound Card TNC
      > Received signals were clearly audible. Didn’t look at S meter.
      > Cheers, Deme, VE7CRT. (near Vancouver BC).
      > From: Edgar Sack
      > Sent: Monday, July 04, 2011 8:43 AM
      > To: V4Protocol@yahoogroups.com
      > Subject: RE: [V4Protocol] V4 ARQ QRV now 10136
      >
      >
      >
      > I’m receiving VE7CRT on 10136.
      >
      >
      > 73,
      >
      >
      > Ed
      >
      >
      > W3NRG
      >
      >
      > From: V4Protocol@yahoogroups.com [mailto:V4Protocol@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Matt Zilmer
      > Sent: Monday, July 04, 2011 7:47 AM
      > To: v4protocol@yahoogroups.com
      > Subject: RE: [V4Protocol] V4 ARQ QRV now 10136
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      > It being a day off and all.... will hang in there listening for a GMN CQ.
      >
      >
      > Matt Zilmer, W6NIA / NNN0UET / NNN0GAF THREE
      > NMCM RMS Winmor: NNU9ET-5: Upland, CA.
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      > ----------------------------------------------------------
      >
      > To: V4Protocol@yahoogroups.com
      > From: ka1gmn@...
      > Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2011 09:16:02 -0500
      > Subject: Re: [V4Protocol] V4 ARQ QRV now 10136
      >
      >
      >
      > Will be on 10136 shortly as soon as I install the latest versin of V4...philw de ka1gmn
      >
      >
      >
      > On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 8:41 AM, Ed Woods WD9DVA <wd9dva@...> wrote:
      >
      >
      >
      >
      > Matt try 7073 a lot of us started there when the fec program began, Happy 4th Ed WD9DVA
      >
      > ----- Original Message -----
      >
      > From: Matt Zilmer
      >
      > To: v4protocol@yahoogroups.com
      >
      > Sent: Monday, July 04, 2011 05:01
      >
      > Subject: RE: [V4Protocol] V4 ARQ QRV now 10136
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      > That's because I couldn't hang out in the shack all morning. I called CQ on 7075.0 for a few minutes. Then I had yard work to do, and a few errands to run. Sorry.
      >
      > I've not had enough successful QSO's using V4 to make a full evaluation. ARQ works fine and as advertised. I got a call from a W4WEB yesterday, the connection came alive, but conditions were suckful so we didn't carry on.
      >
      > FEC has worked fine in the past here. That was before 1.1.1.1 though, and haven't tried it again since a few weeks ago.
      >
      > In Navy-Marine Corps MARS we are starting to see Olivia pop up as a good mode for local and regional traffic. Here in SCA, we've been testing it for a couple weeks with mostly good results. The only problems we've had seem to be codec-related, and sometimes between different types of client AP's (MixW and DM780 for example).
      >
      > I've never used Domino. Would like to give it a spin, but don't see any advertising for its use and don't know anyone local for testing.
      >
      > 73,
      >
      >
      > Matt Zilmer, W6NIA / NNN0UET / NNN0GAF THREE
      > NMCM RMS Winmor: NNU9ET-5: Upland, CA.
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      > ----------------------------------------------------------
      >
      > To: V4Protocol@yahoogroups.com
      > From: esack@...
      > Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2011 16:47:02 -0700
      > Subject: RE: [V4Protocol] V4 ARQ QRV now 10136
      >
      >
      >
      >
      > Roger. I tried both but did not see you in either option.
      >
      > We are in the process of creating a “radio room� for our local EmComm group on top of this building which will put
      > our antennas over 150 feet in the air â€" the highest point in our City and completely out in the clear. At the very least we will
      > have both a Winlink RMS and a Winmor access point up there and if the budget works out, a remote controlled
      > HF rig which will certainly give me a much better chance of enjoying my favorite digital modes.
      >
      > I will continue to watch for VChat stations on 14.073 mh where I do capture a W1 and a W4 from time to time.
      >
      > By the way, I did a competitive study of the then active digital modes some years ago (published in the (ARRL and TAPR Digital
      > Communications Conference for 2007) and found that three or four of the three dozen modes I tested stood out against
      > the rest under the particular evaluation marks I used in the study. As I recall Domino and Olivia were looking quite competitive
      > at that time.
      >
      > How do you feel VChat stacks up against modes like CHIPs when bandwidth is an issue and the conditions are lousy (as they
      > always are with the antennas I have to use for the moment.)
      >
      > 73,
      >
      > Ed
      >
      > W3NRG
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      > From: V4Protocol@yahoogroups.com [mailto:V4Protocol@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Matt Zilmer
      > Sent: Sunday, July 03, 2011 3:05 PM
      > To: v4protocol@yahoogroups.com
      > Subject: RE: [V4Protocol] V4 ARQ QRV now 10136
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      > Data modes are almost always USB.
      >
      >
      > Matt Zilmer, W6NIA / NNN0UET / NNN0GAF THREE
      > NMCM RMS Winmor: NNU9ET-5: Upland, CA.
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      > ----------------------------------------------------------
      >
      > To: V4Protocol@yahoogroups.com
      > From: esack@...
      > Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2011 11:11:05 -0700
      > Subject: RE: [V4Protocol] V4 ARQ QRV now 10136
      >
      >
      >
      >
      > O.K. Hamstick is on the balcony and tuned to 1:1 SWR. When we say 7,075 on V Chat are we talking LSB?
      >
      > Ed
      >
      >
      > From: V4Protocol@yahoogroups.com [mailto:V4Protocol@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Matt Zilmer
      > Sent: Sunday, July 03, 2011 10:44 AM
      > To: v4protocol@yahoogroups.com
      > Subject: RE: [V4Protocol] V4 ARQ QRV now 10136
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      > I'm on 7075 right now.
      >
      >
      > Matt Zilmer, W6NIA / NNN0UET / NNN0GAF THREE
      > NMCM RMS Winmor: NNU9ET-5: Upland, CA.
      >
      >
      >
      >
      > ----------------------------------------------------------
      >
      > To: V4Protocol@yahoogroups.com
      > From: esack@...
      > Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2011 10:39:25 -0700
      > Subject: RE: [V4Protocol] V4 ARQ QRV now 10136
      >
      >
      >
      >
      > Hi Matt,
      >
      > My problem is the eternal condo antenna limitations problem. My antennas “hidden on the balcony� get out better as the
      > wavelengths get smaller.
      >
      > If I were to try my 40 meter hamstick, what forty meter frequency appeals to you? 7,073?
      >
      > 73,
      >
      > Ed
      >
      > W3NRG
      >
      >
      > From: V4Protocol@yahoogroups.com [mailto:V4Protocol@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Matt Zilmer
      > Sent: Sunday, July 03, 2011 7:14 AM
      > To: v4protocol@yahoogroups.com
      > Subject: RE: [V4Protocol] V4 ARQ QRV now 10136
      >
      >
      >
      >
      > Coronado and Upland are about 100 miles apart. Want to try 40m instead? Or 80m?
      >
      >
      > Matt Zilmer, W6NIA / NNN0UET / NNN0GAF THREE
      > NMCM RMS Winmor: NNU9ET-5: Upland, CA.
      >
      >
      > ----------------------------------------------------------
      >
      > To: V4Protocol@yahoogroups.com
      > From: esack@...
      > Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2011 07:06:52 -0700
      > Subject: RE: [V4Protocol] V4 ARQ QRV now 10136
      >
      >
      >
      >
      > Hi Matt,
      >
      > I’ll be listening on 10136 dial USB this morning. Have a very poor 30 meter antenna â€" Hamstick, vertical â€" but if I see you on the screen I will let you know.
      >
      > 73,
      >
      > Ed
      >
      > W3NRG
      > Coronado, CA
      >
      >
      > From: V4Protocol@yahoogroups.com [mailto:V4Protocol@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Matt Zilmer
      > Sent: Sunday, July 03, 2011 7:01 AM
      > To: v4protocol@yahoogroups.com
      > Subject: RE: [V4Protocol] V4 ARQ QRV now 10136
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      > A repeat from yesterday, for anyone interested.... 10136.0 MHz.
      >
      >
      >
      >
      > Anyone around and up for a V4 ARQ check out?
      >
      > 73,
      >
      >
      > Matt Zilmer, W6NIA / NNN0UET / NNN0GAF THREE
      > NMCM RMS Winmor: NNU9ET-5: Upland, CA.
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      > --
      > Philw de KA1GMN
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      > ----------------------------------------------------------
      >
      > No virus found in this message.
      > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
      > Version: 10.0.1388 / Virus Database: 1516/3742 - Release Date: 07/03/11
      >


    • Show all 23 messages in this topic