Its Still the Economy, Stupid! Newsweek Pres. Bill Clinton 27 June 2011
- It's Still the Economy, StupidFourteen million Americans remain out of work, a waste of our greatest resource. The 42nd president has more than a dozen ideas on how to attack the jobs crisis. Andrew Hetherington for NewsweekBill Clinton14 WAYS TO PUT AMERICA BACK TO WORKNext week in Chicago, the Clinton Global Initiative will focus on America for the first time, inviting business and political leaders to make specific commitments in support of the former president's jobs blueprint, which he details below.1. SPEED THE APPROVALSHarry Hopkins had nowhere near the rules and regulations we have now. (In 1933, Hopkins's Civil Works Administration put 4 million to work in a month.) I don't blame the people in the White House for problems in getting shovel-ready projects off the ground; sometimes it takes three years or more for the approval process. We should try to change this: keep the full review process when there are real environ= mental concerns, but when there aren't, the federal government should be able to give a waiver to the states to speed up start times on construction projects. We gave states waivers to do welfare reform, so by the time I signed the bill, 43 of the 50 states had already implemented their own approaches. We need to look at that.2. CASH FOR STARTUPSIf you start a business tomorrow, I can give you all the tax credits in the world, but since you haven't made a nickel yet, they're of no use to you. President Obama came in with a really good energy policy, in-cluding an idea to provide both a tax credit for new green jobs and for startup companies, to allow the conversion of the tax credit into its cash equivalent for every employee hired.Then last December, in the tax-cut compromise, the Republicans in Congress wouldn't agree to extend this benefit because they said, "This is a spending program, not a tax cut. We're only for tax cuts."It was a mistake.The cash incentive worked. On the day President Obama took office, the U.S. had less than 2 percent of the world market in manufacturing the high-powered batteries for hybrid or all-electric cars. On the day of the congressional elections in 2010, thanks in large part to the cashincentive policy, we had 20 percent of global capacity, with 30 new battery plants built or under construction, 16 of them in Michigan, which had America's secondhighest unemployment rate. We have to convince the Republican Congress that this is a good thing. If this incentive structure can be maintained, it's estimated that by 2015 we'll have 40 percent of the world's capacity for these batteries.We could get lots of manufacturing jobs in the same way. I couldwrite about this until the cows come home.3. JOBS GALORE IN ENERGYWhen I was president, the economy benefited because informationtechnology penetrated every aspect of American life. More than onequarter of our job growth and one third of our income growth camefrom that. Now the obvious candidate for that role today is changing the way we produce and use energy. The U.S. didn't ratify the Kyoto accords, of course, because Al Gore and I left office, and the next government wasn't for it. They were all wrong. Before the financial meltdown, the four countries that will meet their Kyoto greenhouse-gas emission targets were outperforming America with lower unemployment, more new business formation, and less income inequality.4. COPY THE EMPIRE STATE BUILDINGJust look at the Empire State BuildingI can see it from my officewindow. Our climate-change people worked on their retrofit project.They cleared off a whole floor for a small factory to change the heating and air conditioning, put in new lighting and insulation, and cut energy-efficient glass for the windows. Johnson Controls, the energy-service company overseeing the project, guaranteed the building owners their electricity usage would go down 38 percentamassive saving, which will enable the costs of the retrofits to berecovered through lower utility bills in less than five years.Meanwhile, the project created hundreds of jobs and cut greenhouse-gas emissions substantially. We could put a million people to work retrofitting buildings all over America.5. GET THE UTILITIES IN ON THE ACTIONLet's suppose you and I go to a blue-collar neighborhood in Rockland County, N.Y., about an hour north of midtown Manhattan. On each house we could do a simple jobin and out in a daythat would almost certainly save 20 percent in energy costs. You wouldn't even need banks if states required the electric companies to let consumers finance this work through utility savings. At least 11 states allow the electric companies to collect the money saved and use it to pay the contractors. So why shouldn't the utilities finance this? To give another example, our climate-change initiative worked with the state of Arkansas, with the support of the governor, to develop a program called HEAL (Home Energy Assistance Loan), in which a company first creates jobs by making its own building more energy-efficient. Then, with the savings from the utility bill, they establish a fund to offer interest-free loans to their employees to finance the same work on their homes. This could be done with a little government support by companies all over the country. You get 7,000 jobs for every billion dollars in retrofitting. Let's start with the schools and colleges and hospitals, and state, county, and local government buildings. That would keep the construction industry busy for a couple of years, creating a million jobs that would ripple through the whole economy, spurring even more growth.6. STATE-BY-STATE SOLUTIONSThere may be some things that the states can do to loosen this up.One of the reasons Harry Reid won in Nevada is that, right before the election, two big Chinese companies announced they were moving factories there to make LED lightbulbs and turbines for the big wind farms down in Texas. Nevada is a little state, and it gained more than 4,000 jobs.The thing I really liked about it was that the Chinese guys played itstraight. They said the decision was pure economics. They didn't say,"We're coming here because Harry Reid is the leader of the Senate."They said, "We're coming here because Nevada has the best stateincentives to go with the federal incentives." They were veryclinical. They said labor costs in China are still cheaper, but theseturbines are big and heavy, and higher transportation costs to theU.S. market would offset the labor gainsand there was a tax creditfrom the federal government for green-energy manufacturing, and extra credits in Nevada.7. GUARANTEE LOANSBefore the last presidential election, I tried for a year to get bothCongress and the administration to deal with the fact that the banks weren't lending because they were still jittery about the economy, and worried about the regulators coming down on them for bad loans still on the books. It's not much better now. Banks still have more than $2 trillion in cash uncommitted to loans.So I suggested that the federal government set asidenot spend$15 billion of the TARP money and create a loan-guarantee program that would work exactly the way the Small Business Administration does. Basically, the bank lends money to a business after the federalgovernment guarantees 75 percent of it. Let's say that the SBA fundhas about a 20-to-1 loan-to-capital ratio, and it's never comeanywhere near bankruptcy. If we capitalized this more conservatively at 10-to-1, we could guarantee $150 billion in loans and create more than a million jobs. We should start with buildings we know will stay in use: most state and local government buildings, schools, university structures, hospitals, theaters, and concert halls. We could include private commercial buildings with no debt. Even if many are strapped for cash, allowing the costs of the retrofits to be paid only from utility savings means the building owners won't be out any cash. It's a "just say yes" system.8. PAINT 'EM WHITELook at the tar roofs covering millions of American buildings. Theyabsorb huge amounts of heat when it's hot. And they require more air conditioning to cool the rooms. Mayor Bloomberg started a program to hire and train young people to paint New York's roofs white. A big percentage of the kids have been able to parlay this simple work into higher-skilled training programs or energy-related retrofit jobs. (And, believe it or not, painting the roof white can lower the electricity use by 20 percent on a hot day!)Every black roof in New York should be white; every roof in Chicagoshould be white; every roof in Little Rock should be white. Everyflat tar-surface roof anywhere! In most of these places you couldrecover the cost of the paint and the labor in a week. It's thequickest, cheapest thing you can do. In the current environment it'sbeen difficult for the mayors to get what is otherwise a piddlingamount of money to do it everywhere. Yet lowering the utility billin every apartment house 10 to 20 percent frees cash that can bespent to increase economic growth.9. DEALS TO MAKE THINGSEvery analysis shows that TARP and the stimulus saved us from asecond Great Depression. After the GM and Chrysler bailouts, we have something like 75,000 more jobs in the industry. Closure of thefactories and the suppliers with them would have cost a million jobs.The stimulus should have been more vigorously defended in the lastelection. It did work, but it didn't "fix the economy" because it wasan $800 billion stimulus trying to fix a $3 trillion hole. Nobody canfill a $3 trillion hole with $800 billion, so it didn't make ordinarypeople feel a lot better, but without it, the unemployment rate would have been 1.5 to 2 percent higher than it is.I'm sympathetic with the objectives of the Bowles-Simpson commission; we do need to do something about long-term debt. It's a question of timing, really. If we cut a lot of government spending while our economy still has so little private investment, we risk weakening the economy even more and increasing the deficit because tax revenues can fall more than spending is cut. That's why the Bowles-Simpson report recommends we delay big spending cuts until next year. So what should we do? More infrastructure initiatives now would put a lot of people back to work. But President Obama doesn't have the votes in the Congress to get another stimulus package. When asked why he robbed banks, Willie Sutton said, "Because that's where the money is." We have to unlock that money and take steps to get U.S. corporations to invest some of the $2 trillion they have accumulated.Without regard to their party or their philosophy, Americans havealways been great at the art of the deal. The real thing that haskilled us in the last 10 years is that too much of our dealmakingcreativity has been devoted to expanding the financial sector inways that don't create new businesses and more jobs and to persuading people to take on excessive debt loads to make up for the fact that their incomes are stagnant. That's one reason why we've been suffering from anemic employment for years. In the seven years and eight months that preceded the meltdown, our economy produced a meager 4 million new jobs, far too few to cope with millions coming into the workforce, and virtually all those jobs were created in housing, finance, and consumer spending.10. TRAIN ON THE JOBAndrew Liveris's book on how we can bring manufacturing back toAmerica cites a company that interviewed 3,600 people for 100 jobsand hired 47; the others didn't have the necessary skills. One answer to the skills roadblock comes from the former labor commissioner in Georgia, Michael Thurmond. After job vacancies go unfilled for a certain period of time, the state offers businesses the money to train potential employees themselves. During the training period, the companies don't become employers, so they don't have to start paying Social Security taxes or employer benefits. They train people their way, then hire those who succeed as regular employees, reducing the time lag between when a job is advertised and when it is filled. With unemployment at 9 percent and the real rate of those without full-time work higher, there are 3 million posted job vacancies.Filling them faster could make a big difference.11. TEACH SKILLS WE NEEDI'm trying to figure out why job seekers don't have the skillscompanies need; why the community colleges and vocational programs, which have done such a great job for America, are not providing more people with the skills to fill these vacancies. Do people just not enroll in the right programs or do they drop out because of the economy? I hope we can find out.