Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Arkansas Supreme Court Overturns State's Ban on Gay Foster Parents

Expand Messages
  • umcornet
    Arkansas Supreme Court overturns state s ban on gay foster parents By Robert Marus Associated Baptist Press Published June 29, 2006 LITTLE ROCK (ABP) -- The
    Message 1 of 1 , Jun 29, 2006
    • 0 Attachment
      Arkansas Supreme Court overturns state's ban on gay foster parents
      By Robert Marus
      Associated Baptist Press
      Published June 29, 2006

      LITTLE ROCK (ABP) -- The Arkansas Supreme Court ruled unanimously June
      29 that the state's child-welfare agency cannot ban gays from being
      foster parents.

      The ban had been the only one of its kind in the nation.

      The justices agreed with a lower court's 2004 ruling that the policy,
      enacted by the Arkansas Child Welfare Agency Review Board, violates
      the Arkansas Constitution because the agency only has authority to
      protect the welfare of children, not to regulate "public morality."

      The ban, enacted in 1999, said foster children could not be placed in
      any home where a gay adult was present. A group of gay would-be foster
      parents, along with a heterosexual foster parent who has a gay son who
      sometimes lives with him, sued the agency with the help of
      civil-liberties groups.

      The courts rejected as baseless the state's argument that being raised
      in a home with gay parents harms children.

      Justice Donald Corbin, writing the court's opinion, said the
      regulation "does not promote the health, safety or welfare of foster
      children but rather acts to exclude a set of individuals from becoming
      foster parents based upon morality and bias."

      Corbin said the state presented no convincing evidence that having a
      gay parent or parents is more harmful to children than having
      heterosexual parents. He also noted that members of the child-welfare
      board were aware of gays who had served as Arkansas foster parents
      prior to the ban, with no reported negative effects.

      While the state argued that children should be raised in homes with
      married heterosexual parents, Arkansas allows single heterosexuals to
      serve as foster parents. The state also does not ban gays from
      permanently adopting children.

      Corbin also noted that two members of the child-welfare board cited
      their religious disapproval of homosexuality in testimony about why
      they support enforcing the ban. "[T]he board's enactment of [the
      regulation] was an attempt to legislate for the General Assembly with
      respect to public morality," he wrote.

      Since the court decided the case, as the lower courts did, on a
      separation-of-powers issue, it did not reach the would-be foster
      parents' other arguments against the policy: That it violated the
      Arkansas and federal constitutions' equal-protection and privacy
      provisions. Justice Robert Brown, however, wrote a separate concurring
      opinion noting he would have found in favor of gay foster parents on
      those counts as well.

      "There is no question but that gay and lesbian couples have had their
      equal-protection and privacy rights truncated without any legitimate
      and rational basis in the form of foster-child protection for doing
      so," Brown wrote.

      But since the majority did not address those arguments, legislators
      could re-write state law to give the board power to issue such a

      Gunner DeLay, a Republican candidate for Arkansas attorney general,
      issued a statement shortly after the ruling saying he would push for
      such a law.

      "It seems that the court's action was based on a concern for gay and
      lesbian couples and not what is in the best interest in the child,"
      the statement read. "In spite,[sic] of what testimony may have been
      presented at trial the fact is that a child has the best chance for
      proper development with the presence of a mother and father in the
      home. There is no substitute for what God and nature intended."

      Officials for the American Civil Liberties Union of Arkansas, which
      sued on behalf of the original plaintiffs, praised the ruling.

      The court "clearly understood what social scientists and every
      respected child welfare organization have been saying for years: There
      is no reason to deprive children of good homes by excluding lesbian
      and gay people from serving as foster parents," said Rita Sklar, the
      group's executive director, according to a press release. "We have a
      shortage of foster homes in Arkansas, especially for teenagers and
      sibling groups. Thanks to today's ruling, Arkansas' foster children
      have a better chance of finding loving homes."
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.