The Rogak No-Fault Blog: 17 Jun 2011 ** IME Scheduling Letters **
In today's Rogak No-Fault Blog:
What's the difference between these two sentences:
"The insurer is required to inform the claimant of his right to reimbursement for lost earnings and transportation costs in attending the IME."
"The claimant has the right to be reimbursed for lost earnings and transportation costs in attending the IME."
Answer: one of the above makes the IME scheduling letter invalid.
We wrote the book on New York No-Fault
The 2011 Supplement to Rogak's New York No-Fault Law & Practice is here!