Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

The Rogak Report: 25 June 2010 (Pt 2) ** No Fault - Workers Compensation **

Expand Messages
  • Lawrence
    In today s Rogak Report: When the claimant tells an IME doctor that he was employed at the time of the accident, does that mean he was actually working, so
    Message 1 of 1 , Jun 25, 2010
    View Source
    • 0 Attachment

      In today's Rogak Report:

      When the claimant tells an IME doctor that he was "employed at the time of the accident," does that mean he was actually working, so that Workers Compensation, and not No-Fault, is primary for first party benefits?   What do you think?  Find out what an Arbitrator held: http://www.newyorknofaultadvisor.com/blog.php

      Larry Rogak

    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.