Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

The Rogak Report: 31 Mar 2008 ** Scaffold Law - Window Cleaning **

Expand Messages
  • Lawrence Rogak
    COMMERCIAL WINDOW CLEANER S FALL WHILE STANDING ON DESK CREATES SCAFFOLD LAW CLAIM: ELEVATION RISK CITED BY COURT OF APPEALS Swiderska v. New York University
    Message 1 of 1 , Mar 31, 2008
    • 0 Attachment

      COMMERCIAL WINDOW CLEANER'S FALL WHILE STANDING ON DESK CREATES SCAFFOLD LAW CLAIM: "ELEVATION RISK" CITED BY COURT OF APPEALS

      Swiderska v. New York University
      2008 NY Slip Op 02503
      Decided on March 20, 2008
      Court of Appeals
      Edited by Lawrence N. Rogak

      As part of a commercial cleaning contract, plaintiff's employer instructed her to clean the 10-foot-high interior windows in a dormitory building, providing her with only a rag and window washing solution to complete the task. When plaintiff asked for a ladder so that she could reach the tops of the windows, she was instructed to climb on furniture instead. While standing on a bed in an attempt to clean a window, plaintiff fell to the floor, suffering multiple fractures and other injuries. This Labor Law § 240(1) action ensued.

      The parties cross-moved for summary judgment on the issue of liability, with both lower courts granting judgment in favor of defendants on the theory that the activity in which plaintiff was engaged constituted routine maintenance not covered by Labor Law § 240(1).   The Court of Appeals reversed.

      "We disagree and conclude that plaintiff was entitled to summary judgment on the issue of liability. In Broggy v Rockefeller Group, Inc. (8 NY3d 675 [2007]), we held that commercial window cleaning comparable to the activity at issue here is encompassed within Labor Law § 240(1) if it created the type of elevation-related risk that the statute was intended to address. In this case, plaintiff established that she was injured while cleaning 10-foot-high windows in a college dormitory with a rag, which required her to climb upon pieces of furniture in order to complete her work — creating an elevation-related risk — and she was not provided a ladder, scaffold or other safety device of the kind contemplated under the statute."

      As a result summary judgment was granted to plaintiff.

      Larry Rogak

    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.