Re: [TaxoCoP] Re: Faceted search analytics - percentage of refinements on search?
- Hi Stephanie - I would agree with your thoughts here.
For the most part, I have found within a solution, the average for
metrics like this are pretty stable over time.
It can be useful to understand how your average compares to others to
give you some idea of where you fall in a spectrum. (As an aside, it
would be even better to be able to compare your measures with similar
search solutions and just an overall average but I don't think we have
enough insight to do that, yet.)
But the more interesting and actionable things you can do with these
insights is to compare the measure of individual terms against your
overall average to identify outliers. You can then analyze details
around those to try to improve whatever is going on (or, possibly, try
to improve others if you have individual terms that are performing
demonstrably better than others for a certain measure).
The more individual terms you can identify that are problematic in
some way, the more effective any time you can invest in them is going
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 6:30 AM, stephaniealemieux
> Thanks to all who replied about faceted search stats.
> I think the average facet usage rate is pretty low in general, though it depends on the context. I heard a lot of numbers that were under 10% - which almost makes you wonder why we go through so much trouble building the faceted search in the first place!
> But I think it's also an interesting metric in analyzing search relevancy. High facet usage may be in some cases (more documents/content than e-commerce) tan indication that search results are not relevant enough. Users are compelled to use facets to refine the selection more often because they don't get good results initially.
> Of course, this is not necessarily all bad, as it means the users have tools at their disposal to make such refinements. But if it's coupled with a high search depth metric (number of search pages viewed), it might indicate that the refinements themselves are not effective.
> The site I'm assessing right now has an average facet use of 18%, but it climbs to over 40% for some search terms. I'm going to use that as a "canary in the coal mine" in this case.
> Thanks again to all,