Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

No need for TDS remittance until earner’s identity is clear

Expand Messages
  • yatinvisawadia
    Publication:Economic Times Delhi; Date:Nov 30, 2006; Section:Economy; Page Number:27 No need for TDS remittance until earner s identity is clear M Padmakshan
    Message 1 of 1 , Dec 1, 2006
    • 0 Attachment
      Publication:Economic Times Delhi; Date:Nov 30, 2006;
      Section:Economy; Page Number:27



      No need for TDS remittance until earner's identity is clear

      M Padmakshan MUMBAI



      YOU have no liability to pay TDS until you know the identity of
      the person who receives the income. This is the upshot of a Mumbai
      Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) ruling.

      The ITAT, the second appellate body on tax matters, passed this
      order on an appeal filed by the Industrial Development Bank of India
      (IDBI), which faced interest and penalty of over Rs 4 crore on
      charges of defaulting on TDS remittance. IDBI did not remit TDS on
      interest payable to its regular return bondholders, even though it
      had claimed deduction on account of the same. The department did not
      accept IDBI's reason for not remitting TDS.

      IDBI took the stand that there was no way of knowing before
      March 31, the last date for making advance tax payment, the identity
      of the bondholders who were to be paid interest. The identity of the
      bondholders could not be known earlier, because IDBI, for the
      purpose of paying interest, takes into account only bondholders who
      are registered with IDBI on May 15 of each year.

      The ITAT held that IDBI has no liability to deduct tax at source
      in relation to interest payable to its bondholders since it did not
      know who were the bondholders until March 31, the last date for
      paying advance tax each year.

      In the relevant accounting year, IDBI made a provision of Rs
      55.31 crore for interests accrued and claimed deduction in
      computation of business income. Though deduction was claimed on
      account of interest payable to the bondholders, IDBI did not remit
      the tax payable from such interest payments.

      Section 193 of the Income-tax Act and the explanation read with
      it stipulate that TDS is payable as and when payment is made or
      credited. Thus, the income-tax assessing officer held that IDBI was
      required to deduct the tax at source from the credit to interest
      payable account; since this was not done, interest and penalty was
      levied on the bank. The concerned officer made an order levying tax
      and penalty for three years aggregating to Rs 4.37 crore. The
      assessment years in this case are 1994-95, 1995-96 and 1996-97.

      IDBI counsel Dinesh Vyas argued that liability to tax deduction
      at source is a vicarious liability and presupposes existence of a
      principal liability in the hands of a person who is to receive the
      income. He argued that while IDBI's liability to pay interest is
      certain and provision has to be made as on March 31 upon the end of
      the accounting year, the bond being freely transferable, it cannot
      be ascertained as to who will be the registered bondholder as on May
      15 every year. In this situation, IDBI will not know by the end of
      the fiscal year that who will be entitled to receive the interest.

      NEW RULES

      IDBI faced an interest and penalty of over Rs 4 crore on charges of
      defaulting on TDS remittance

      The bank had claimed deductions for TDS for interest payable on
      bondholders whose payments were due on May 15
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.