Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: [TalkAntietam] re Moxley Sorrel and September 16th (Night)

Expand Messages
  • DPowell334@AOL.COM
    two things - other sources talk about a company acting as HQ guard for Stuart, so it is possible that Sorrell is talking about them and not the main body of
    Message 1 of 31 , Apr 3 8:26 AM
    • 0 Attachment
      two things - other sources talk about a company acting as HQ guard for
      Stuart, so it is possible that Sorrell is talking about them and not the main body
      of the regiment, and two, Rowland doesn't really say when they broke away to
      rejoin Stuart.

      But at face value, Rowland does seem to corroborate your point, not
      Sorrell's account.

      Anyone picked up Hopkins' Book; "the Little Jeff" to see what he says?
      Supposed to be a pretty complete regimental, or so I've heard. I have an interest
      in their old commander, Will Martin, but I can't really justify the purchase
      of an eastern unit regimental for what would likely be a couple of pages of
      biblio references.

      Dave Powell


      In a message dated 4/3/2009 9:11:05 A.M. Central Standard Time,
      d.essig@... writes:

      Saw that one Dave, sure doesn't put the Legion anywhere near the West
      Woods on the 16th, though. Moving from Birkettsville to follow McLaws
      to the field (and Richard Anderson, for that matter) places them
      south, maybe well south, of the ford at dawn.


      **************Worried about job security? Check out the 5 safest jobs in a
      recession.
      (http://jobs.aol.com/gallery/growing-job-industries?ncid=emlcntuscare00000003)


      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
    • eighth_conn_inf
      And we can t forget the raincoat Stonewall had on the night he was shot; it is at the VMI museum and a picture is on their website. It has the two bullet holes
      Message 31 of 31 , Apr 10 8:38 AM
      • 0 Attachment
        And we can't forget the raincoat Stonewall had on the night he was shot; it is at the VMI museum and a picture is on their website. It has the two bullet holes in the left sleeve.

        http://www4.vmi.edu/museum/Jackson.html

        Larry

        --- In TalkAntietam@yahoogroups.com, Dave <gewehr@...> wrote:
        >
        > For what it's worth, even though it was very early in the war, when CSA
        > Gen Felix Zollicoffer was killed in the battle of Mill Springs in KY on
        > Jan 19, 1862, he was wearing either a "white rubber" or "light drab
        > overcoat buttoned to the chin." Due to the rain and hanging smoke, he
        > managed to ride right through the Federal lines unmolested and was only
        > shot when he spoke to a US officer on his way back out. One of the
        > accounts said that a US Lt. Col was wearing a similar coat, so nobody
        > thought anything about it.
        >
        > Dave McGowan
        >
        > Thomas Clemens wrote:
        > >
        > > To parse terms with you for a moment, officers purchase all of their
        > > own clothing and equipment and although guidelines are published, a
        > > certain lattitude is in what they wear and use. Lee's talma and
        > > overalls were likely rubberized and privately purchased. Jackson was
        > > wearing a rubberized coat when he was shot.
        > >
        > > Thomas G. Clemens D.A.
        > > Professor of History
        > > Hagerstown Community College
        > >
        > > >>> "Teej Smith" <teej@... <mailto:teej%40nc.rr.com>> 04/04/09
        > > 1:01 PM >>>
        > >
        > > Larry wrote:
        > >
        > > Teej,
        > >
        > > I see only Sorrel mentioning this--do you have other sources
        > > mentioning raingear?
        > >
        > > Sorry, no I don't. In fact the only other place I've "over-alls"
        > > mentioned was in connection with a Union soldier at Ball's Bluff.
        > > Sorrel wrote, "It had rained and he (Lee) was wearing a rubber poncho
        > > and over-alls, his body and legs being thus well protected." I suppose
        > > they could be the canvas wear you described in your message but that
        > > wouldn't be much protection from the rain. But perhaps from the mud?
        > > Whatever they were, they must have been loose fitting because later
        > > Sorrel wrote that while reaching for his bridle, Lee "tripped in his
        > > over-alls and fell forward, not prone, but catching on his hands."
        > >
        > > Sorrel then went on to describe the nature of Lee's injuries and to
        > > note word of his being hurt reached the Northern newspapers which went
        > > into great detail as to the nature of his injury. Their report was Lee
        > > had been seriously wounded and even went so far as to describe how Lee
        > > received his wound. Would like to see that newspaper report. Sorrel
        > > confirmed Lee was able to ride a little by the time of Antietam.
        > > However, I have seen a letter written by Lee in April 1863 in which he
        > > said he was still having problems with one of his hands.
        > >
        > > Regards,
        > > Teej
        > >
        > >
        > > .
        > >
        > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
        > >
        > >
        >
      Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.