Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: Stone Mill and House

Expand Messages
  • cowie_steve
    Tom, I had always been under the impression that the stone mill was part of Jacob Avey s 82- acre farm, but Brian at the VC could not confirm this, as it may
    Message 1 of 22 , Jun 26, 2008
    • 0 Attachment
      Tom,

      I had always been under the impression that the stone mill was part of Jacob Avey's 82-
      acre farm, but Brian at the VC could not confirm this, as it may have been part of the
      McGraw farm, directly opposite the Lower Bridge Road from the Avey farm. The McGraw
      property is spelled on some maps as "Magraw." Sorry to not be of further help.

      Steve

      --- In TalkAntietam@yahoogroups.com, "RoteBaron" <RoteBaron@...> wrote:
      >
      > Thanks, Steve. That clarifies my question regarding Miller Sawmill.
      >
      > Still trying to get any info about Stone Mill and House. What was name of family that
      lived there?
      >
      > Tom Shay
      >
      >
      > ----- Original Message -----
      > From: cowie_steve
      > To: TalkAntietam@yahoogroups.com
      > Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 4:19 PM
      > Subject: [TalkAntietam] Re: Stone Mill and House
      >
      >
      > Tom,
      >
      > Per the C & O Canal Companion, Miller's Basin, located at mile 70.7, was a small
      > community located next to the canal that included Miller's Sawmill. Lee Barron, IIRC,
      briefly
      > describes the origin of Mr. Miller's sawmill in "History of Sharpsburg."
      >
      > Best,
      >
      > Steve
      >
      > --- In TalkAntietam@yahoogroups.com, RoteBaron@ wrote:
      > >
      > > Given that there is a Miller's Sawmill Road, where is Miller's Sawmill?
      > > Was the Stone Mill possibly a sawmill?
      > >
      > > Tom Shay
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > > -------------- Original message --------------
      > > From: "Harry Smeltzer" <hjs21@>
      > > If it's safe to assume the Stone Mill and house were not called the Stone
      > > mill and house because the family's name was Stone, then is it safe to
      > > assume the mill wasn't called Miller's because the family's name was Miller?
      > >
      > > Seems damn convenient, if you get my drift.
      > >
      > > Harry
      > >
      > > -----Original Message-----
      > > From: TalkAntietam@yahoogroups.com [mailto:TalkAntietam@yahoogroups.com] On
      > > Behalf Of RoteBaron@
      > > Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 1:09 PM
      > > To: TalkAntietam@yahoogroups.com
      > > Subject: Re: [TalkAntietam] Stone Mill and House
      > >
      > > I found some info on the building's name. Within Adelman & Smith's "Antietam
      > > Then & Now" book, it states on page 31 adjacent to the photo:
      > >
      > > "Miller's mill C. 1906. Located at the edge of Sharpsburg, the mill was
      > > converted into a Confederate stronghold until captured by Union forces.
      > > Privately owned, the mill stands today..."
      > >
      > > Tom Shay
      > >
      > > -------------- Original message --------------
      > > From: RoteBaron@comcast. <mailto:RoteBaron%40comcast.net> net
      > > The set of buildings southeast of Sharpsburg are always referred to as the
      > > Stone Mill and the Stone House. Was there a family associated with these
      > > structures? Can I assume their name wasn't Stone?
      > > Tom Shay (I'll be stomping the fields of Antietam on Friday June 27)
      > >
      > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
      > >
      > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
      > >
      > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
      > >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
      >
    • RoteBaron@comcast.net
      The Ninth Vermont s history is online (link is below). Starting around page 25, their experiences during surrender of Harper Ferry are told. I posted some
      Message 2 of 22 , Jun 26, 2008
      • 0 Attachment
        The Ninth Vermont's history is online (link is below). Starting around page 25, their experiences during surrender of Harper Ferry are told. I posted some notable excerpts below....

        After the plundering immediately following the surrender was stopped, there was little to compain of in the treatment accorded to the Union troops.

        Footnote: We were placed under guard of General Branch�s division and were treated very kindly by General Branch and his command, who evinced much sorrow for us.��Colonel Stannard.

        When the order came to start, the regiments marched down to the pontoon bridge crossing into Maryland, past a line of Virginia planters arrayed on the bank, watching for negroes who might try to escape with the troops. All such were at once claimed and dragged from the ranks. In one case a dark-complexioned soldier of the Ninth was claimed and collared by a planter, who discovered his mistake when the soldier's arm shot out. The claimant measured his length on the ground, and arose in great wrath; but the man easily established his membership of the regiment, and passed on with it, unmolested.

        The march of the regiment to Annapolis began on the 16th of September, and occupied five days. It was not a triumphal procession. The men were without tents and but few had blankets, and rations were poor and scanty. The only comfort about it was that it was not toward Libby prison.

        Near Frederick the column met crowds of stragglers of McClellan's army,and among them several men of the First Vermont brigade, following the army to Antietam; and next day, the 17th, the roar of the battle there came plainly to their ears. Stannard allowed no wandering from the ranks, on the march, and the regiment moved in noticeably better shape than most of the paroled regiments.8It averaged twenty miles a day, and the last hot day made twenty-three miles, arriving at Annapolis Sunday, the 21st, at 6 P. M.

        The footsore men were glad to halt and go into camp, though there was scanty shelter for the 10,000 paroled prisoners now collected there, and no comfort in the old camps, filled with vermin, in which they were quartered. A fresh disappointment came in the news that they were to be sent to a parole camp at Chicago, instead of being allowed, as they had hoped, to return to Vermont until exchanged. They stayed in Annapolis but three days.On the 25th they took boat to Baltimore and thence went by train to Chicago.

        The unit's history is online at:
        http://64.233.169.104/search?q=cache:_HNmkk-JULYJ:www.vermontcivilwar.org/bene/23.pdf+Harper+Ferry+General+Wool+ordered+parole+Annapolis&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=40&gl=us

        Tom Shay

        -------------- Original message --------------
        From: Stephen Recker <recker@...>
        If the Confederates captured all of the Union soldiers at Harper's
        Ferry right before the Battle of Antietam, and if the Union Army
        marched the Union prisoners under guard back to Washington and to
        prisons beyond, who were the Union soldiers who guarded the Union
        prisoners as they marched to D.C.? Thanks.

        Stephen Recker




        [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
      • corey.macleod
        Stephen, do you mean Union soldiers marched the confederate prisoners back to Washington?
        Message 3 of 22 , Jun 26, 2008
        • 0 Attachment
          Stephen, do you mean Union soldiers marched the confederate prisoners
          back to Washington?

          --- In TalkAntietam@yahoogroups.com, Stephen Recker <recker@...> wrote:
          >
          > If the Confederates captured all of the Union soldiers at Harper's
          > Ferry right before the Battle of Antietam, and if the Union Army
          > marched the Union prisoners under guard back to Washington and to
          > prisons beyond, who were the Union soldiers who guarded the Union
          > prisoners as they marched to D.C.? Thanks.
          >
          > Stephen Recker
          >
        • G E Mayers
          He is talking about the paroled Union soldiers from the HF surrender.... Yr. Obt. Svt. G E Gerry Mayers To Be A Virginian, either by birth, marriage,
          Message 4 of 22 , Jun 26, 2008
          • 0 Attachment
            He is talking about the paroled Union soldiers from the HF
            surrender....

            Yr. Obt. Svt.
            G E "Gerry" Mayers

            To Be A Virginian, either by birth, marriage, adoption, or even
            on one's mother's side, is an introduction to any state in the
            Union, a passport to any foreign country, and a benediction from
            the Almighty God. --Anonymous
            ----- Original Message -----
            From: "corey.macleod" <coreymacleod@...>
            To: <TalkAntietam@yahoogroups.com>
            Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 2:26 PM
            Subject: [TalkAntietam] Re: HF Prisoners


            Stephen, do you mean Union soldiers marched the confederate
            prisoners
            back to Washington?

            --- In TalkAntietam@yahoogroups.com, Stephen Recker <recker@...>
            wrote:
            >
            > If the Confederates captured all of the Union soldiers at
            > Harper's
            > Ferry right before the Battle of Antietam, and if the Union
            > Army
            > marched the Union prisoners under guard back to Washington and
            > to
            > prisons beyond, who were the Union soldiers who guarded the
            > Union
            > prisoners as they marched to D.C.? Thanks.
            >
            > Stephen Recker
            >
          • Stephen Recker
            Corey, Howdy. Nope. After the surrender of Harper s Ferry, there were a bunch of Union prisoners, not Confederate prisoners. They were marched back to DC under
            Message 5 of 22 , Jun 26, 2008
            • 0 Attachment
              Corey,

              Howdy. Nope. After the surrender of Harper's Ferry, there were a bunch
              of Union prisoners, not Confederate prisoners. They were marched back
              to DC under Union guard. It is kind of hard to get your head around, I
              know.

              Stephen

              On Thursday, June 26, 2008, at 02:26 PM, corey.macleod wrote:

              > Stephen, do you mean Union soldiers marched the confederate prisoners
              > back to Washington?
              >
              > --- In TalkAntietam@yahoogroups.com, Stephen Recker <recker@...> wrote:
              > >
              > > If the Confederates captured all of the Union soldiers at Harper's
              > > Ferry right before the Battle of Antietam, and if the Union Army
              > > marched the Union prisoners under guard back to Washington and to
              > > prisons beyond, who were the Union soldiers who guarded the Union
              > > prisoners as they marched to D.C.? Thanks.
              > >
              > > Stephen Recker
              > >


              [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
            • G E Mayers
              Dear Stephen, Since they were paroled prisoners from the surrendered HF garrison, and since there were so many of them, would it not make sense to have them
              Message 6 of 22 , Jun 26, 2008
              • 0 Attachment
                Dear Stephen,

                Since they were "paroled" prisoners from the surrendered HF
                garrison, and since there were so many of them, would it not make
                sense to have them escorted back to DC under guard of Union
                infantry. After all, according to the protocols, they could not
                rejoin their larger units and resume active duty until they were
                properly exchanged, correct?

                Corey, the surrender of the US garrison at HF (Harper's Ferry)
                during the Maryland 1862 campaign would remain the largest
                single, mass surrender of US Army forces until the garrison on
                Bataan surrendered in early 1942 to the Japanese Imperial Army
                during the Second World War.

                Yr. Obt. Svt.
                G E "Gerry" Mayers

                To Be A Virginian, either by birth, marriage, adoption, or even
                on one's mother's side, is an introduction to any state in the
                Union, a passport to any foreign country, and a benediction from
                the Almighty God. --Anonymous
                ----- Original Message -----
                From: "Stephen Recker" <recker@...>
                To: <TalkAntietam@yahoogroups.com>
                Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 5:22 PM
                Subject: Re: [TalkAntietam] Re: HF Prisoners


                > Corey,
                >
                > Howdy. Nope. After the surrender of Harper's Ferry, there were
                > a bunch
                > of Union prisoners, not Confederate prisoners. They were
                > marched back
                > to DC under Union guard. It is kind of hard to get your head
                > around, I
                > know.
                >
                > Stephen
                >
                > On Thursday, June 26, 2008, at 02:26 PM, corey.macleod wrote:
                >
                >> Stephen, do you mean Union soldiers marched the confederate
                >> prisoners
                >> back to Washington?
                >>
                >> --- In TalkAntietam@yahoogroups.com, Stephen Recker
                >> <recker@...> wrote:
                >> >
                >> > If the Confederates captured all of the Union soldiers at
                >> > Harper's
                >> > Ferry right before the Battle of Antietam, and if the Union
                >> > Army
                >> > marched the Union prisoners under guard back to Washington
                >> > and to
                >> > prisons beyond, who were the Union soldiers who guarded the
                >> > Union
                >> > prisoners as they marched to D.C.? Thanks.
                >> >
                >> > Stephen Recker
                >> >
                >
                >
                > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
                >
                >
              • Troy Cool
                Fellows, It is my understanding that after the parole the units left under the command and discipline of thier own officers (one reason the officers retained
                Message 7 of 22 , Jun 26, 2008
                • 0 Attachment
                  Fellows,
                  It is my understanding that after the parole the units left under the command and discipline of thier own officers (one reason the officers retained thier side arms) and were not technically under guard until they had returned to Federal lines. Here they then were dealt with in various manners to prevent desertion etc.  I believe the first troops encountered would have been Franklin's Corps but have not read of the actual exchange.  Anyone know those details?






                  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
                • Troy Cool
                  Sorry,   Sincerely, Troy ... From: G E Mayers Subject: Re: [TalkAntietam] Re: HF Prisoners To: TalkAntietam@yahoogroups.com Date:
                  Message 8 of 22 , Jun 26, 2008
                  • 0 Attachment
                    Sorry,
                     
                    Sincerely,
                    Troy

                    --- On Thu, 6/26/08, G E Mayers <gerry1952@...> wrote:

                    From: G E Mayers <gerry1952@...>
                    Subject: Re: [TalkAntietam] Re: HF Prisoners
                    To: TalkAntietam@yahoogroups.com
                    Date: Thursday, June 26, 2008, 9:24 PM






                    Dear Stephen,

                    Since they were "paroled" prisoners from the surrendered HF
                    garrison, and since there were so many of them, would it not make
                    sense to have them escorted back to DC under guard of Union
                    infantry. After all, according to the protocols, they could not
                    rejoin their larger units and resume active duty until they were
                    properly exchanged, correct?

                    Corey, the surrender of the US garrison at HF (Harper's Ferry)
                    during the Maryland 1862 campaign would remain the largest
                    single, mass surrender of US Army forces until the garrison on
                    Bataan surrendered in early 1942 to the Japanese Imperial Army
                    during the Second World War.

                    Yr. Obt. Svt.
                    G E "Gerry" Mayers

                    To Be A Virginian, either by birth, marriage, adoption, or even
                    on one's mother's side, is an introduction to any state in the
                    Union, a passport to any foreign country, and a benediction from
                    the Almighty God. --Anonymous
                    ----- Original Message -----
                    From: "Stephen Recker" <recker@virtualgetty sburg.com>
                    To: <TalkAntietam@ yahoogroups. com>
                    Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 5:22 PM
                    Subject: Re: [TalkAntietam] Re: HF Prisoners

                    > Corey,
                    >
                    > Howdy. Nope. After the surrender of Harper's Ferry, there were
                    > a bunch
                    > of Union prisoners, not Confederate prisoners. They were
                    > marched back
                    > to DC under Union guard. It is kind of hard to get your head
                    > around, I
                    > know.
                    >
                    > Stephen
                    >
                    > On Thursday, June 26, 2008, at 02:26 PM, corey.macleod wrote:
                    >
                    >> Stephen, do you mean Union soldiers marched the confederate
                    >> prisoners
                    >> back to Washington?
                    >>
                    >> --- In TalkAntietam@ yahoogroups. com, Stephen Recker
                    >> <recker@...> wrote:
                    >> >
                    >> > If the Confederates captured all of the Union soldiers at
                    >> > Harper's
                    >> > Ferry right before the Battle of Antietam, and if the Union
                    >> > Army
                    >> > marched the Union prisoners under guard back to Washington
                    >> > and to
                    >> > prisons beyond, who were the Union soldiers who guarded the
                    >> > Union
                    >> > prisoners as they marched to D.C.? Thanks.
                    >> >
                    >> > Stephen Recker
                    >> >
                    >
                    >
                    > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
                    >
                    >


















                    [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
                  • Stephen Recker
                    Interesting. Thanks. Stephen ... [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
                    Message 9 of 22 , Jun 26, 2008
                    • 0 Attachment
                      Interesting. Thanks.

                      Stephen


                      On Thursday, June 26, 2008, at 09:53 PM, Troy Cool wrote:

                      > Fellows,
                      > It is my understanding that after the parole the units left under the
                      > command and discipline of thier own officers (one reason the officers
                      > retained thier side arms) and were not technically under guard until
                      > they had returned to Federal lines. Here they then were dealt with in
                      > various manners to prevent desertion etc.  I believe the first troops
                      > encountered would have been Franklin's Corps but have not read of the
                      > actual exchange.  Anyone know those details?


                      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
                    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.