Re: [TalkAntietam] McClellan's after action reports
- Dear Tom,
I would tend to go with Mac's initial report on Antietam rather than
his August 1863 report...which, as you state, is not only self serving
but also the writing of a, for lack of a better word, "cashiered"
general. Mac's orders to repair himself to Trenton and await further
orders...which were never sent....effectively "cashiered" him out of
A pretty neat trick by Stanton, IMHO.
Yr. Obt. Svt.
G E "Gerry" Mayers
To Be A Virginian, either by birth, marriage, adoption, or even on
one's mother's side, is an introduction to any state in the Union, a
passport to any foreign country, and a benediction from the Almighty
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stephen Recker" <recker@...>
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 9:52 AM
Subject: Re: [TalkAntietam] McClellan's after action reports
> Thanks for the note. I got this from his August report:
> My plan for the impending general engagement was to attack the
> left with the corps of Hooker and Mansfield, supported by Sumner's
> if necessary, by Franklin's, and, as soon as matters looked
> there, to move the corps of Burnside against the enemy's extreme
> upon the ridge running to the south and rear of Sharpsburg, and,
> carried their position, to press along the crest toward our right,
> whenever either of these flank movements should be successful, to
> advance our center with all the forces then disposable.
> Two points. First, I certainly agree that this is not how it
> Franklin was necessary, but not used. The move to the center never
> Second, I seem to remember reading somewhere in Harsh about
> having seen the salient at the Sunken Road, where the tower is, as
> being the main point he wished to attack. I don't remember it being
> footnoted, and remember thinking that it was the first place that I
> heard that.
> On Thursday, February 1, 2007, at 09:10 AM, Thomas Clemens wrote:
>> Off the top of my head, and without sources to look at, I think
>> discusses both to some extent. Carman refers to both, but does not
>> into them in any depth. My view is that the second one, which
>> calls his "elaborate" report, was written after he was relieved and
>> much more self-justifying. He also suggests that his plan was
>> how the battle worked out and I don't believe that at all.
- I think this is amazing. It sure isn't talked about much.
On Thursday, February 1, 2007, at 08:54 PM, Tom Shay wrote:
> Harsh explains the westward movements of I Corps on page 351. Here are
> two excerpts pertaining to this topic:
> "....Meade turned left into the open country, but the contours of the
> ground carried him southwest, rather than south, and the lead brigade
> under Truman Seymour eventually struck the Smoketown Road".
> "Instead of turning left and filling the interval to the creek,
> Doubleday's division continued westward."