RE: [TalkAntietam] Re: McClellan has the 'fasts'
- Lee's miscalculation (due to Stuart's failures) regarding the speed,
direction and disposition of the Army of the Potomac in the days leading up
to splitting his army spelled the failure of the Maryland Campaign.
From: TalkAntietam@yahoogroups.com [mailto:TalkAntietam@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of James2044
Sent: Monday, July 11, 2005 5:56 PM
Subject: [TalkAntietam] Re: McClellan has the 'fasts'
--- In TalkAntietam@yahoogroups.com, "Jeff Beckner \(PWC Magazine\)"
> Mac as a bulldozer....this was in the fiction section, right?Lee didn't think so in the Fall of 1862.
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
* Visit your group "TalkAntietam
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TalkAntietam> " on the web.
* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> Terms of Service.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
- OK. Thanks.
From: TalkAntietam@yahoogroups.com [mailto:TalkAntietam@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of Thomas Clemens
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 2:35 PM
Subject: RE: [TalkAntietam] McClellan has the 'fasts'
I read the book too, and thought the mention of the K-N Act was
tangental to the theme. Rafuse was discussing McClellan's shift from a
tradtional Whig to a Douglas Democrat, and IIRC, Jim wanted a discussion
of the inconsistency of that shift due to Douglas' sponsoring of the K-N
Act. Rafuse does talk about it later, in the context of Lincoln, but it
cannot be fairly said that Rafuse ignores or leaves it out. It just was
not as emphasized as Jim thought it should be. Fair criticism, but not
an indictment of the author.
Thomas G. Clemens D.A.
Professor of History
Hagerstown Community College
>>> jbeckner@... 07/12/05 10:53 AM >>>OK....are they dealt with in any detail? One of Jim's criticisms (he
READ the book, you know) was that Rafuse didn't raise some questions on
some topics that probably should have been raised.
Yahoo! Groups Links