I don't have much of an opinion one way or the other
regarding the perspectives shared in this
discussion... we all agree that preserving as much as
possible is the goal....
But I throw the following out to be chewed upon...
I am of the belief that you cannot, nor should you
save EVERYTHING. If this was the case, then there
would be a fence around everything from the
Susquehanna River to the Appomattox River.
For example, there is a grass roots effort to save the
"Battle of Falling Waters" Battlefield in Berkeley
County, WV. I have seen numerous "Save the..."
campaigns for battlefields that I, as someone has been
a "Civil War Nut" since I was about 8 years old,
barely heard of. This effort would be better served
if those taking on these projects would instead, join
the cause to protect Harpers Ferry, or Antietam, or
Gettysburg. How many "heritage tourism" visitors will
actually go out of their way to visit the "Falling
Waters County Battlefield"?
I had an ancestor who was killed on June 1, 64 in a
skirmish in Hannover County, VA, which resulted in
about 30 casualties. If it were to develop, should a
ground swell rise to save the site? Not in my
opinion. Put the effort that would have been put into
that toward the effort to save Chancellorsville.
It would seem to me that the more logical tact is to
focus on those pivotal battles, most of which are
already National Parks, and focus on making sure that
all the land within their boundaries are protected,
and buffers around those parks are established.
Submitted for discussion and consideration...
Middletown Maryland (which too was a battlefield)
--- G E Mayers <gerry1952@...
> Dear Robert,
> As Brian so aptly pointed out, we continue to lose
> valuable Civil War
> Battlefields and their acreage each day. While the
> ideal would be to
> preserve "all". we have simply to admit that saving
> "all" may not be
> financially or physically possible.
> What we need to do, and should do (and this is what
> CWPT and other groups
> are doing), is decide on the most endangered ones
> and unite to save them. A
> clear example of this is the grass roots fight to
> prevent the Mullins Farm
> from being sold and developed. From what was an
> outcry on the local
> Spotsylvania County level grew, thanks to efforts of
> Brian Pohanka and
> others, to a national effort.
> We clearly need to have much the same type of effort
> put into saving what
> can be saved of what is left of important Civil War
> battlefields such as
> Manassas, Franklin, etc.
> Very respectfully,
> G E "Gerry" Mayers
> Confederate Signal Corps,
> Longstreet's Corps
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "robert blama" <civilwar1@...>
> To: <TalkAntietam@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Monday, March 07, 2005 6:15 PM
> Subject: Re: [TalkAntietam] NH at Antietam:
> >I did not suggest we don't try to preserve and
> continuing to buy land. Our
> >CW roundtable always gives to preservation and so
> do I on a personal basis.
> >I'm sorry you got that out of my last msg. I would
> like to see all CW
> >battlefields aquired and restored to their original
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Brian Morris
> > To: TalkAntietam@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Monday, March 07, 2005 12:56 AM
> > Subject: Re: [TalkAntietam] NH at Antietam:
> > Land costs money and there was a lot of
> battlefield land after the war.
> > Historic preservation then is different than the
> thinking of today. First
> > off there was no such thing as National Military
> Parks. Those didn't come
> > into being until 30 years after the war was over
> and when they did they
> > consisted of only small sections of what they are
> today. The high points
> > as
> > you will.
> > Gettysburg National Battlefield Park for example
> is currently 5,990
> > acres.
> > However in it's earlier days it was only in the
> area of 600 acres. It has
> > taken another 100 years to aquire the other
> 5,000+ acres. That's not the
> > end
> > either. There are still hundreds of acres inside
> the park boundry that
> > are
> > not actually owned by the NPS. Antietam also is
> still growing with
> > acreage
> > being added the last several years and still
> large chunks of the
> > battlefield
> > still belong in private hands.
> > Acquiring battlefield land is an ongoing effort
> and will be for years to
> > come. Last year alone the good people at the
> Civil War Preservation Trust
> > managed to acquire 3,100 acres of hallowed ground
> at places like Shiloh
> > and
> > Chancellorsville. This land doesn't come cheap.
> The Home Sweet Home Motel
> > in
> > Gettysburg several years ago cost $1.2 million to
> preserve only 1.5
> > acres.
> > The price of battlefield land also many times is
> inflated as the owner
> > knows
> > they simply have to threaten to develope the land
> to push the price up.
> > It's
> > not uncommon for owners of battlefield land to
> ask for 10 times the
> > accessed
> > value of the land from preservation groups.
> > According to the CWPT 20% of the nation's Civil
> War Battlefields are
> > gone.
> > Here in Kansas City the Battle of Westport
> Battlefield was completely
> > destroyed. Of the remaining battlefield land in
> this country only 15% is
> > preserved. In otherwards only a small fraction of
> the battlefield land in
> > this country has been preserved.
> > The reason I went through all that was to try and
> show how huge and
> > costly
> > this is. It's not a matter of just deciding to do
> it and going out and
> > buying it all up because if it were that easy it
> would have been done
> > long
> > ago. The reason the veterans didn't buy and
> preserve all this land years
> > ago
> > is because it was impossible to do so. But just
> because they weren't able
> > to
> > do so doesn't mean we shouldn't continue the
> > Brian
> > > But this is besides the point, and I definitely
> approve of
> > preservation.
> > We must buy the land to preserve these
> battlefields. But if you wanted
> > to
> > use a twisted kind of logic the veterans did not
> buy up battlefields and
> > the
> > people of the day sold the battlefield land for
> whatever. Should we
> > preserve their wishes and not preserve the
> battlefiels like Franklin
> > which
> > is all but gone?
> > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> > ADVERTISEMENT
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TalkAntietam/
> > b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an
> email to:
> > TalkAntietamemail@example.com
> > c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the
> Yahoo! Terms of
> > Service.
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been
> > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> > ADVERTISEMENT
=== message truncated ===
Celebrate Yahoo!'s 10th Birthday!
Yahoo! Netrospective: 100 Moments of the Web