Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

6854Re: [TalkAntietam] Hill's Light Division March

Expand Messages
  • troyacool@yahoo.com
    Jun 28, 2012
      Sorry about that- yes it's Les Jensen and his articles in the CMH, that lays out the type system.
      Doubt they were Federal trousers, but could be captured.
      Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

      -----Original Message-----
      From: "G E Mayers" <gerry1952@...>
      Sender: TalkAntietam@yahoogroups.com
      Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 08:03:50
      To: <TalkAntietam@yahoogroups.com>
      Reply-To: TalkAntietam@yahoogroups.com
      Subject: RE: [TalkAntietam] Hill's Light Division March

      Dear Mike,

      I agree... Troy could be right. Yes, Les Jensen is the one, IIRC, who actually put the labels of Richmond Deport I, II, III on the jackets.I find it very interesting that no surviving examples (so far as is known) of Type I remain, but plenty of the transitional style between I and II, and probably between II and III.

      When it went to Chickamauga, the two divisions of Longstreet's Corps that went west were all outfitted with kersey blue trowsers according to research Don Troiani did for one of his paintings. The trowsers may have been appropriated from dead Yankees.

      Hope this helps!


      -----Original Message-----
      From: TalkAntietam@yahoogroups.com [mailto:TalkAntietam@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of MikeL49NYVI@...
      Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2012 7:16 AM
      To: TalkAntietam@yahoogroups.com
      Subject: Re: [TalkAntietam] Hill's Light Division March

      Hi Gerry:

      While I am very new to the study of CSA coats, I believe that Troy has
      it correct. I have seen where the Stonewall Brigade got new English
      Uniforms in early '63 which would have been the Tait jackets, and a cadet gray.
      Some of this type of coat appears to have been issued without the shoulder
      straps, and some with them.

      Another place I looked says that the study and research is still going on,
      as far as when the Type III's were made. From what I have seen, it seems
      to depend upon the amount of available cloth, and how many uniforms they had
      to make.

      And someone else may know a lot more about this, but I do not see a
      labeling of the jackets being done, just producing what they could, with what
      they had to work with. The labels( I, II, III )is a more modern terminology
      way to distinguish them.

      Mike L

      In a message dated 6/27/2012 11:17:13 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
      gerry1952@... writes:


      I thought Depot III uniforms were not issued until 1864 at the earliest?


      -----Original Message-----
      From: _TalkAntietam@yahoogroups.com_ (mailto:TalkAntietam@yahoogroups.com)
      (mailto:TalkAntietam@yahoogroups.com) ]On Behalf Of _MikeL49NYVI@..._ (mailto:MikeL49NYVI@...)
      Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2012 10:19 PM
      To: _TalkAntietam@yahoogroups.com_ (mailto:TalkAntietam@yahoogroups.com)
      Subject: Re: [TalkAntietam] Hill's Light Division March

      I have a semi-related story:
      We have been researching the 1st Texas for a CSA impression, and have
      ben getting a lot of background material from the 1st Texas in Houston.
      discussing uniform coats, he told me that the 1st received new Richmond
      Depot III coats from England, which were cadet gray, after Gettysburg. It
      seems that there was so much blue in them, that at Chickamaugua, their own
      friends from Longstreet's Corps mistook them for Federals, and fired a
      volleys at them.
      So, it was not uncommon to mistake friend from foe, in any battle. Even
      when wearing the right uniform.

      Mike Lavis

      In a message dated 6/27/2012 7:12:29 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
      _tgclemens@..._ (mailto:tgclemens@...) writes:

      Thanks Mike. I am always skeptical of regimental histories, too much
      post-war influence on the writes. I do not doubt that some guys were
      captured clothing, but I doubt enough of them to fool anyone to think they
      were a Union unit. I recall somewhere, no time to look now, a CS soldier
      saying unlike others, he only took underclothing, not wanting to be shot
      mistakenly. Good stuff!

      From: _TalkAntietam@yahoogroups.com_ (mailto:TalkAntietam@yahoogroups.com)
      [_TalkAntietam@yahoogroups.com_ (mailto:TalkAntietam@yahoogroups.com) ]
      behalf of Jim Rosebrock [_pointsalines@..._
      (mailto:pointsalines@...) ]
      Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2012 5:55 AM
      To: _TalkAntietam@yahoogroups.com_ (mailto:TalkAntietam@yahoogroups.com)
      Subject: Re: [TalkAntietam] Hill's Light Division March

      Are William Morris's letters found in a book on the 27th North Carolina?
      Jim Rosebrock

      From: Michael Hardy
      <_mchardy@..._ (mailto:mchardy@...)
      To: "_TalkAntietam@yahoogroups.com_ (mailto:TalkAntietam@yahoogroups.com)
      <_TalkAntietam@yahoogroups.com_ (mailto:TalkAntietam@yahoogroups.com)
      Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 10:25 AM
      Subject: [TalkAntietam] Hill's Light Division March

      Teej - Capt.
      William Morris, commanding the 37th North Carolina Troops, Branch's
      Light Division, writes home on September 23, 1862: “…we went to harpers
      Ferry & captured
      Twelve Thousand yankeys and all of there arms & stores. they surrendered
      without Much fighting. We had a fine time at harpers fery. Got Plenty
      Shugar & Coffee, in fact all
      most any thing we could wish, clothing, etc.”
      He writes again
      on September 28, 1862: “I have Clothes plenty to Doo Me all winter as we
      Got what we wanted at Harpers Ferry.”
      There are
      probably other examples in other letter sets. I just happen to be more
      with the 37th NCT.
      Kindest Regards,
      North Carolina and the Civil War blog
      2010-11 North Carolina Historian of the Year


      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


      Yahoo! Groups Links

      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
    • Show all 13 messages in this topic