Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

5681Re: [TalkAntietam] Re: re Moxley Sorrel and September 16th (Night)

Expand Messages
  • Dave
    Apr 5, 2009
    • 0 Attachment
      For what it's worth, even though it was very early in the war, when CSA
      Gen Felix Zollicoffer was killed in the battle of Mill Springs in KY on
      Jan 19, 1862, he was wearing either a "white rubber" or "light drab
      overcoat buttoned to the chin." Due to the rain and hanging smoke, he
      managed to ride right through the Federal lines unmolested and was only
      shot when he spoke to a US officer on his way back out. One of the
      accounts said that a US Lt. Col was wearing a similar coat, so nobody
      thought anything about it.

      Dave McGowan

      Thomas Clemens wrote:
      > To parse terms with you for a moment, officers purchase all of their
      > own clothing and equipment and although guidelines are published, a
      > certain lattitude is in what they wear and use. Lee's talma and
      > overalls were likely rubberized and privately purchased. Jackson was
      > wearing a rubberized coat when he was shot.
      > Thomas G. Clemens D.A.
      > Professor of History
      > Hagerstown Community College
      > >>> "Teej Smith" <teej@... <mailto:teej%40nc.rr.com>> 04/04/09
      > 1:01 PM >>>
      > Larry wrote:
      > Teej,
      > I see only Sorrel mentioning this--do you have other sources
      > mentioning raingear?
      > Sorry, no I don't. In fact the only other place I've "over-alls"
      > mentioned was in connection with a Union soldier at Ball's Bluff.
      > Sorrel wrote, "It had rained and he (Lee) was wearing a rubber poncho
      > and over-alls, his body and legs being thus well protected." I suppose
      > they could be the canvas wear you described in your message but that
      > wouldn't be much protection from the rain. But perhaps from the mud?
      > Whatever they were, they must have been loose fitting because later
      > Sorrel wrote that while reaching for his bridle, Lee "tripped in his
      > over-alls and fell forward, not prone, but catching on his hands."
      > Sorrel then went on to describe the nature of Lee's injuries and to
      > note word of his being hurt reached the Northern newspapers which went
      > into great detail as to the nature of his injury. Their report was Lee
      > had been seriously wounded and even went so far as to describe how Lee
      > received his wound. Would like to see that newspaper report. Sorrel
      > confirmed Lee was able to ride a little by the time of Antietam.
      > However, I have seen a letter written by Lee in April 1863 in which he
      > said he was still having problems with one of his hands.
      > Regards,
      > Teej
      > .
      > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
    • Show all 31 messages in this topic