5559Re: [TalkAntietam] re Rodes brigade at Sunken Road
- Mar 2, 2009Dean;
You have given me much to think about here and this is a great
help for my book manuscript.....
I checked Harsh this evening and he says nothing about Longstreet
exercising any major tactical control but he does say something
interesting in TATF about Lee basically leaving the northern part
of the field to Jackson, Longstreet and D H Hill from about noon
or onwards and concentrating on the problems manifesting
themselves down on the Lower Bridge (the Confederate right).
Yr. Obt. Svt.
G E "Gerry" Mayers
To Be A Virginian, either by birth, marriage, adoption, or even
on one's mother's side, is an introduction to any state in the
Union, a passport to any foreign country, and a benediction from
the Almighty God. --Anonymous
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dean Essig" <d.essig@...>
Sent: Monday, March 02, 2009 2:23 PM
Subject: Re: [TalkAntietam] re Rodes brigade at Sunken Road
> On Mar 2, 2009, at 11:18 AM, G E Mayers wrote:
>> So why did Longstreet order the attack by Rodes?
> I can find nothing that explains Longstreet's thinking here
> his report or memoirs mention the event at all). The
> would be that the ridge the Union was fighting from looks to be
> better for the defense that the rather flat low area of the
> Road on that left flank.
>> Was this before the unfortunate incident with Col Lightfoot of
>> the Sixth Alabama? or after it?
> All of this must have happened before that.
>> Also, was this before the Irish
>> Brigade attack?
> Based on the maps in Unfurl those Colors, by the time the Irish
> formed and were beginning their attack, the 14 CT had backed
> off and
> disengaged (10:30 am), my my guess is this occured before the
> Brigade was involved.
> Also, that book does mention the assorted attacks out of the
> Road, but only in general terms and does not go into detail
> about the
> Confederates involved.
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>