Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

4741Re: Kentucky Rfiles used in the battle of Sharpsburg

Expand Messages
  • Scott Hann
    Jun 3, 2008
      Dear Gerry,

      Perhaps I'm using the wrong nomenclature. I've seen references to
      "Country Rifles", and the fact that they fired a "picket bullet", but,
      as yet, have never seen a photograph of such weapon. Could it be the
      readily available Kentucky Rifle they're talking about? I have in my
      collection a Country Rifle bullet mold recovered near Dunker Church,
      and saw a similar mold with Antietam provenance on display at Heritage
      Day in Sharpsburg.

      I quickly skimmed through Dean Thomas' "Ready ... Aim ... Fire! Small
      Arm Ammunition in the Battle of Gettysburg" and found that .69 shotgun
      slugs have been recovered from the Gettysburg Battlefield, but it's
      unclear whether they were used by a smoothbore musket or shotgun.
      Apparently it could be fired by both.

      As for the "Rohrbach Barn", your guess is as good as mine. I know
      about the substantial barn on the Henry Rohrbach Farm, but don't know
      if one existed on the Noah Rohrbach property. These are the only two
      Rohrbach's that I know of.


      --- In TalkAntietam@yahoogroups.com, "G E Mayers" <gerry1952@...> wrote:
      > Dear Scott,
      > Thanks.
      > Use of smoothbore weapons...like the M1842 Springfield...is well
      > documented for both sides at Antietam. However, the Harpers
      > Weekly issue might be talking about Kentucky troops in the
      > Western theater.
      > To my knowledge I have never heard of any KY rifle use at
      > Sharpsburg during the battle but maybe Tom Clemens knows. As to
      > the shotgun...that would be a most unusual weapon for an
      > infantryman to carry... I would understand cavalry, especially
      > Confederate cavalry.
      > Rhorbach Barn...question then becomes which Rohrbach farm?
      > Yr. Obt. Svt.
      > G E "Gerry" Mayers
      > To Be A Virginian, either by birth, marriage, adoption, or even
      > on one's mother's side, is an introduction to any state in the
      > Union, a passport to any foreign country, and a benediction from
      > the Almighty God. --Anonymous
      > ----- Original Message -----
      > From: "Scott Hann" <wutheringheights@...>
      > To: <TalkAntietam@yahoogroups.com>
      > Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 8:23 AM
      > Subject: [TalkAntietam] Re: Kentucky Rfiles used in the battle of
      > Sharpsburg
      > Dear Gerry,
      > There's a woodcut in August 17, 1861 issue of Harper's Weekly
      > depicting Confederate uniforms, one of which is for the Kentucky
      > Rifle
      > Brigade. It's unclear if they were armed with Kentucky Rifles,
      > or
      > were just a brigade from Kentucky armed with rifled muskets. In
      > either case, to the best of my knowledge, there was not a brigade
      > at
      > Antietam that was armed exclusively with outdated Kentucky
      > Rifles.
      > However, could this longarm have seen use at Antietam?
      > I've been corresponding with a 2nd Georgia historian who's heard
      > rumors of their use at Sharpsburg, however we're looking for
      > definitive proof that at least one solider is documented to have
      > used
      > one at Antietam.
      > We know for a fact that the Irish Brigade was issued Model 1842
      > .69-caliber smoothbore muskets. In my own collection I have an
      > English Mortimer shotgun found in the Rohrbach Barn after the
      > battle
      > (probably left by a wounded soldier), and a bayonet adapted for
      > use on
      > a shotgun documented to have been found on the battlefield.
      > So, with a overall range of 700-800 yards, and the ability to
      > kill a
      > man at 250 yards, it's at least plausible that the Kentucky
      > Rifle,
      > with its' superior accuracy over the above mentioned arms, could
      > have
      > seen use at Antietam.
      > Scott
    • Show all 8 messages in this topic