3599Re: [TalkAntietam] G.A.R. Reno Post #4 Hagerstown
- Aug 23, 2007Scott,
Reno Post #4 signed a lease with the mayor of Hagerstown on April 1,
1905 for "all that room or hall, known as the Old Town Hall, formerly
occupied by the Masonic Lodge, situate in the building on the
south-east corner of North Potomac Street and East Franklin Street,
Hagerstown". The building was replaced by the current City Hall, built
That said, I have a muster list of the Post from 1899. Unfortunately it
simply lists the address as "Hagerstown". The post commander was S.D.
Martin. That might be a clue to something.
I also have a Quartermaster report from 1910. It lists the commander as
E C. Mobley.The roster from 1899 lists an Ed. M. Mobley. His address is
listed as 3 1/2 West Franklin, coincidentally that is the old address
of famed Antietam battlefield photographer E.M. Recher. The Rose Hill
Cemetery in Hagerstown has two very old gravestones that read, in part,
"Sons of E.M. Mobley and E.C. Mobley". Perhaps another rabbit hole?
Nonetheless, the 1910 quartermaster report says that the post only has
$400 "Cash invested in Furniture, Flags, etc."
I got hold of the name of the woman who holds all of the historical
material for that building. I'll drop by her office tomorrow and see
what she knows. Maybe she'll have big boxes of stuff hidden away. We
can only hope.
I'll send a copy of these materials to you via regular mail. No
information about or photos of the relics, but perhaps a clue to
On Thursday, August 23, 2007, at 11:13 AM, Scott Hann wrote:
> OK Brian, I'm game. I have my own "ghost stories" that I've
> personally experienced on the Antietam battlefield, but I'll leave
> them for another time.
> I'm seeking information about G.A.R. Reno Post #4 in Hagerstown, MD.
> Does anyone know if photos from this Post exist, or has any
> information about the collection it housed? Also, I'm looking for
> information about early displays of Antietam relics. So-called "relic
> boards," such as the one that hung in the Antietam Train Station.
> Thanks, Scott
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>