Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

1114Re: [TalkAntietam] Hartwig's talk on Iron Brigade

Expand Messages
  • david lutton
    Feb 7, 2003

      The time question aside. If I may, did Scott touch on Battery B's
      participation in the cornfield action?

      David Lutton
      Hollidaysburg Pa
      ----- Original Message -----
      From: <rotbaron@...>
      To: <TalkAntietam@yahoogroups.com>
      Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 10:17 AM
      Subject: Re: [TalkAntietam] Hartwig's talk on Iron Brigade

      > In a message dated 02/07/2003 9:52:11 AM EST, gerry1952@... writes:
      > << However, the time of when the Iron Brigade began advancing seems a
      > odd to me, particularly when most accounts state the Federal advance
      > began at first light, which would be between 5.30 and 6.00 am. >>
      > Perhaps he meant that they began their hurried assembly into formation at
      > that time and not necesarily took their first steps towards the south?
      > noted that when the troops encamped, they had no idea as to their
      > geography. The troops were wet but so exhausted that many references
      > on their deep sleep. Their early awakening was initiated by officers who
      > notified that Reb batteries were spotted on Nicodemus Hts and they were
      > in-range.
      > FYI..for the past 8+ years, I've parked at the Cornfield around 6 AM and
      > walked along the pike to the North Woods to join the 7 AM anniversary
      > I recall that one can see fairly well by 6:30 AM (if there is no fog), so
      > wouldn't be 5:30 AM in 1862 timekeeping?
      > Of course we all know that any time references to hours/minutes during
      > are commonly inaccurate.
      > Tom Shay
      > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
    • Show all 7 messages in this topic