Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Topics List

Luke 18

Chuck Jones: You're reply is very helpful. I conclude from it that when you call Q fictive you're being pejorative and dismissive of your colleagues Bruce:
E Bruce Brooks
1:44 PM

~~`RE: [Synoptic-L] The posited 'Mark and Second Source' hypothesis

David S, I wanted to post this before I forgot what I had just been thinking about, so I don’t expect a quick reply. Here
David Inglis
4:48 PM

Re: ~~`RE: [Synoptic-L] The posited 'Mark and Second Source' hypothe

No sooner do I pause in the conversation, thinking to take up Bultmann on another day, than It is demanded that I comment on Ed Sanders. David S: Bruce stated
E Bruce Brooks
Jun 25

FW: [Synoptic-L] The Sign of Jonah

Bruce wrote: "On both sides of Mk 10:45, Luke is manifestly following Mark. Why should he *at just this point* turn aside to access some other source, when he
David Sloan
Jun 23

Mark and the Lord's Prayer

On 6/4/2017 10:25 AM, Ronald Price ron@pricepeakhome.plus.com [Synoptic] ... I fail to see how this engages in petitio principii. ... It is a reasonable
Jeffrey Gibson
Jun 4
View First Topic Go to View Last Topic