Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Topics List

Foundations of Q

Bruce, I share your skepticism re. M and L. As I see it, the most we can say for sure is that M represents material that only appears in Mt, and L represents
David Inglis
12:46 PM

Matthew conflator's problematic use/disuse of Luke

On 5 July 2015 at 12:00, alan.garrow@yahoo.com [Synoptic] ... Thanks for the useful clarifications, Alan. My own take on Watson's L/M nomenclature is that it
Mark Goodacre
10:19 AM

Shifting Sands of Q

David, despite my earlier comments, I do fully agree with your main point here, which (as I understand it) is that we should expect that any pair of gospel
David Inglis
Jul 3
View First Topic Go to View Last Topic
Loading 1 - 3 of total 3 topics