- Goto Message #
(99)What reason might there be for Matthew not containing the passage about the man with the unclean spirit in the synagogue? Can this be explained on the basis of
(33)Dear Jeffrey, I've reread both of my posts on M and GJn, and they are clear. The discussion is about form--there is no reason one would think I was referring
(10)The article is cited came out last Summer - so no published responses as yet.
Fetching Sponsored Content...
(44)Thanks David S. I have not looked into this before, so thanks for your reasoning. Basically, I don’t have enough knowledge of the details of Q to say who I
(11)Hi Jeffrey: As you know my position is that Jesus is referring to himself as the bar nasha of Daniel and Enoch. Regards, Jack Kilmon Houston, Texas ... From:
(18)I note with interest that in response to my note thatthere is no evidence that Jews /in Jesus' day/ expected the deliverance of bread to be something that God
(29)When I mentioned the “lehem mahar” issue I did indicate that I had reservations about it and that was why I emphasized the word _if_. However Jerome’s
(31)Jeffrey, yes, Roth (in common with the majority) believes "that Luke preceded Marcion and that Marcion truncated Luke." It is my opinion that what can be
(3)... And this would be a bad think why? ... I'm just exploring the idea of how what Jesus is saying is that "just as Jonah was subject to tribulation for his
(3)... Thanks! Jeffrey -- Jeffrey B. Gibson, D.Phil. (Oxon.) 1500 W. Pratt Blvd. #1 Chicago, IL 60626 firstname.lastname@example.org On 4/3/2017 1:48 PM, Greg Crawford
View First Topic Go to