Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Fw: Fw: [Synoptic-L] The "2 1/2 source" hypothesis

Expand Messages
  • Steph Fisher
    ... From: Dave To: Steph Fisher Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 4:47 PM Subject: Re: Fw: [Synoptic-L] The 2 1/2
    Message 1 of 1 , Feb 9, 2006
      ----- Original Message -----
      From: "Dave " <gentile_dave@...>
      To: "Steph Fisher" <steph7@...>
      Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 4:47 PM
      Subject: Re: Fw: [Synoptic-L] The "2 1/2 source" hypothesis

      --- In Synoptic@yahoogroups.com, "Steph Fisher" <steph7@...> wrote:
      > Hello David,


      > Do you mean the "Farrer Hypothesis"? (and not Ferrier?)


      > I prefer to think of it as the MwQ Hypothesis (Mark without Q).
      My own
      > research is suggesting to me so far that my conclusion will be
      closer to MwQ
      > than Mark with a Q.

      So we're probably in pretty close agreement, since I think Luke
      probaly saw some of Matthew's text.

      > As for the different birth narratives being stumbling blocks, see
      > Goodacre "The Case Against Q" pp. 54ff.

      I read it, although a while ago now. I still don't think Luke saw
      Matthew 1 and 2 however. Why change all those names? Altohugh,
      obviously he could have seemn it and choosen not to use it. I just
      think its more probable that he didn't see it.

      Thanks for the feedback,

      Dave Gentile
      Riverside, IL

      No virus found in this incoming message.
      Checked by AVG Free Edition.
      Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.3/254 - Release Date: 8/02/2006
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.