Re: [Synoptic-L] What is the early evidence for Luke chapters 1-3?
> 2. More generally, can we give a terminus ante quem forA well known argument on gospels datation is : since there is a
> anything in Lk?
prediction of Jerusalem fall, the stuff was writen after the fall. But I
liked also the reverted argument : Is the description of Jerusalem fall
fitting the real one ? If not, then the stuff is prior to the fall.
Who buy it ?
> Are any of the John parallels helpful,If I well remember, Boismard listed many other John-Luke connections,
> that is, do they include wording which,
> among the Synoptics, could have come only
> from Lk? Yes, but not many.
> 2a. - 2b. - 2c. - 2d. - 2e. - 2f.
using previous older references. See his proto-Luke.
> 3. All in all, I would say that there is a case that JnOr Luke and John shared a common source.
> knew Lk, and was a little more comfortable in Lk's company
> when nobody else (Mk, Mt) was around, but was shy to the
> point of contrary elsewhere.