4849Re: [Synoptic-L] How many verses in the Songerguts, Triple or Double Traditions, etc.
- May 10, 2013Just curious David, but what is it that "verses" relate to?
Clauses (properly identified) seem to have more potential value.
Just a thought....
Sent from my iPhone
On May 10, 2013, at 2:10 PM, "David Inglis" <davidinglis2@...> wrote:
> So far, such replies as I have seen (thank you) concentrate on word counts. These will, of course, vary depending on
> which variants are or are not counted, and so there really is no single answer. However, for my purposes word counts are
> (at the moment at least) taking me down into detail I don't need, and so for now I'm concentrating just on verses. If
> this proves unsatisfactory, I'm going to drop down to clauses (I think). Anyway, for now these are the verse counts
> (round numbers) I'm using for Luke, and if anyone cares to comment or suggest other numbers, I'm all ears (or eyes!):
> Total Luke: 1150
> Unique to Luke: 550
> Luke/Matthew only: 200
> Luke/Mark only: 70
> Luke/Matthew/Mark: 330
> David Inglis, Lafayette, CA, 94549, USA
> From: Synoptic@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Synoptic@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of E Bruce Brooks
> Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2013 9:35 PM
> To: Synoptic@yahoogroups.com
> Cc: GPG
> Subject: RE: [Synoptic-L] How many verses in the Songerguts, Triple or Double Traditions, etc.
> To: Synoptic / GPG
> In Response To: David Inglis
> On: Counting Verses
> From: Bruce
> David Inglis asks if there is a consensus on verse counts for single, double, or triple tradition verses. I should
> suppose that the only real consensus in this area consists in the (Eusebian?) numbering of verses, and gets vaguer when
> one goes higher up. (And even that numbering is sometimes problematic).
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>