Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

4849Re: [Synoptic-L] How many verses in the Songerguts, Triple or Double Traditions, etc.

Expand Messages
  • Rick Hubbard
    May 10, 2013
    • 0 Attachment
      Just curious David, but what is it that "verses" relate to?

      Clauses (properly identified) seem to have more potential value.
      Just a thought....



      Sent from my iPhone

      On May 10, 2013, at 2:10 PM, "David Inglis" <davidinglis2@...> wrote:

      > So far, such replies as I have seen (thank you) concentrate on word counts. These will, of course, vary depending on
      > which variants are or are not counted, and so there really is no single answer. However, for my purposes word counts are
      > (at the moment at least) taking me down into detail I don't need, and so for now I'm concentrating just on verses. If
      > this proves unsatisfactory, I'm going to drop down to clauses (I think). Anyway, for now these are the verse counts
      > (round numbers) I'm using for Luke, and if anyone cares to comment or suggest other numbers, I'm all ears (or eyes!):
      > Total Luke: 1150
      > Unique to Luke: 550
      > Luke/Matthew only: 200
      > Luke/Mark only: 70
      > Luke/Matthew/Mark: 330
      > David Inglis, Lafayette, CA, 94549, USA
      > https://sites.google.com/site/inglisonmarcion/
      > From: Synoptic@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Synoptic@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of E Bruce Brooks
      > Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2013 9:35 PM
      > To: Synoptic@yahoogroups.com
      > Cc: GPG
      > Subject: RE: [Synoptic-L] How many verses in the Songerguts, Triple or Double Traditions, etc.
      > To: Synoptic / GPG
      > In Response To: David Inglis
      > On: Counting Verses
      > From: Bruce
      > David Inglis asks if there is a consensus on verse counts for single, double, or triple tradition verses. I should
      > suppose that the only real consensus in this area consists in the (Eusebian?) numbering of verses, and gets vaguer when
      > one goes higher up. (And even that numbering is sometimes problematic).
      > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
    • Show all 20 messages in this topic