2781Re: [Synoptic-L] Re: [XTalk] The Great Omission
- Aug 3, 2010At 10:23 AM 8/3/2010, E Bruce Brooks wrote:
>...Perhaps the key question, with Streeter's and my view of the Omission, is:Your discussion intrigues me, but perhaps out of ignorance. Please
>Can a codex hypothesis be framed such that the Omission lies on a finite
>number of leaves, and also so that the preceding material begins, as it
>must, at the top of a recto page? The answer is Yes. Several attempts have
>been made to show this. One such attempt made years ago on this family of
>E-lists seemed to me to be flawed in detail. A less flawed construct (to my
>mind) is possible, but I have so far not been able to place that paper with
>any of the SBL groups which might have hosted it. It too will eventually
>appear, though it seems not earlier than 2012....
provide greater detail, or at least references, on the "Several attempts have
been made to show this."
And how do you respond to Dennis Goffin's reply?
Northern Arizona University
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>