151Re: [Synoptic-L] Re: Mt/Lk agreements in order against Mk
- Aug 3, 2005On 03/08/05, Wieland Willker <willker@...-bremen.de> wrote:
> I have read the article now and have to conclude that there are NOThe difficulty here is that you are invoking a proposed solution to
> "major agreements in order" of Mt and Lk against Mk.
> Sanders lists four instances, all consist of only one verse. But three
> of them are from Mark/Q overlap, so it is possible that they are not
> from Mk.
the problem (that Mark and Q overlap) as part of your statement of the
data. Mark-Q overlap has been a particular difficulty in this area --
Mark-Q overlap has become so accepted a part of the standard solution
to the Synoptic Problem that it is regularly presented as a means of
describing the data. I argue in various places that one should not
talk about Mark-Q overlaps when one is describing the data; rather,
one should talk about major agreements between Matthew and Luke
Dr Mark Goodacre mailto:Goodacre@...
Dept of Theology and Religion
University of Birmingham
Elmfield House, Selly Oak tel.+44 121 414 7512
Birmingham B29 6LG UK fax: +44 121 415 8376
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>