Re: Canon SDK and SDM?
- View SourceI just tried RemoteCapture with my PowerShot S230, and it worked.
But, I just tried RemoteCapture with my TX1, and it did not work.
(Though, I'm not sure if I'm using the latest version of RemoteCapture.)
So, maybe RemoteCapture *is* based on the Canon SDK ?
That was disheartening.
- View SourceBrian wrote:
> That was disheartening.Unless we can get this to work :-
The author hints that it is a bit sluggish.
- View SourceI have been in touch with the Author, the program is using CHDK, he
graciously pointed me to the source files (kbd.c), and has even
offered to help (but he's pretty busy too). What he's doing is just
what I'm suggesting, a "new" command based protocol for multi-
function control using SDM (which is based on CHDK).
The "normal" USB remote control functions defined by Canon's SDK are
not supported by the TX1. (why not?) I tried all the "commercial"
remote control software on them and of course nothing worked. Even if
it did support the SDK functions, from my brief study of it I think
the control available would not be sufficient. I think building a new
protocol as we have discussed has the best chance of working.
--- In StereoDataMaker@yahoogroups.com, "David Sykes"
> Brian wrote:
> > That was disheartening.
> Unless we can get this to work :-
> The author hints that it is a bit sluggish.
- View SourceKen Burgesswrote:
> he graciously pointed me to the source files (kbd.c)That applies to about ten generic cameras.
You would put similar code in \platform\tx1\kbd.c.
> has even offered to helpOn the CHDK forum he stated that he did not intend to develop it further.
> but he's pretty busy tooOf course .......
> I think building a new protocol as we have discussed has the bestI wish you luck, it will be interesting to see any preliminary results.
> chance of working.
- View SourceI'm curious, too, as to why the TX1 isn't
supporting the 'normal' protocol of the Canon SDK.
I'm wondering if Canon intends to offer a
firmware upgrade to the TX1 at some point to add
support for the 'normal' protocol.
I really like the fact that the 'normal' protocol
supports a live digital video feed from the camera over
the USB cable. Before real-life interrupted me, I
was trying to combine the digital live feeds from two cameras
into a live stereo pair (anaglyph or field sequential).
That was using just PowerShot S230 (still) cameras.
The response times of the 'normal' protocol, also
seem much faster than the protocol seen on the
CHDK serial protocol YouTube spot. It'd be
nice to have synchronized zoom. I'm into 3D video.
The TX1 has a lot of great possibilities for 3D video.
The lack of a synchronized slow push-in (slow zoom)
has been the one artistic speed bump.
I just got my Y-cable. (YEAH!!!) So, I'm just hooking
up my TX1 pair, now. They seem to turn off recording
after just a few seconds of recording. So, I'm still
on the beginner's learning curve.
SDM currently offers synchronized trigger and zoom,
which is VERY cool !!! God, SDM is such a cool tool!
Thanks, to everyone who worked on this!! Awesome!
As a thought, non-sync'ed parameter matching could
probably be accomplished through PTP. That is,
a controller could load all the parameters into
a file. Then, pass the file to both cameras over PTP
(USB file protocol). SDM would only need a signal
to auto-load the file when it arrives on the camera's SD card.
The parameter transfer file could even be in the pre-existing
configuration (.cfg) file format, so no new code would
need to be written. (Just an incomplete thought.)
It's a hack, but that might be the minimum amount of work
to accomplish matching parameters on both cameras.
- View SourceOn 01/06/2008, vfxdoctor <brianrg@...> wrote:
> The response times of the 'normal' protocol, alsoI'm the author of said code & video. Nothing in that video was the
> seem much faster than the protocol seen on the
> CHDK serial protocol YouTube spot. It'd be
> nice to have synchronized zoom. I'm into 3D video.
> The TX1 has a lot of great possibilities for 3D video.
> The lack of a synchronized slow push-in (slow zoom)
> has been the one artistic speed bump.
least bit designed for stereo sync - in fact, that recording was the
only time I've had the two cameras connected! No reason why /any/
operation couldn't be synchronised to the same degree of accuracy as
shooting is synchronised in SDM (due to the discoveries made by SDM).
It's simply a case of issuing a command followed by a synchronisation
More explanations another time - it's late here.
- View SourceIs the command issued over regular USB
(usual wires)? Or are they encoded over the power line? (Like the SDM sync trigger.)
It would certainly make matching the ISO, Focus,
aperature, and shutter speeds on both cameras (or more)
a lot easier!
Out of curiousity... Anyone know if the zoom speed could be controlled
by stepping the zoom On and Off in rapid succession?
> It's simply a case of issuing a command followed by a synchronisation
> More explanations another time - it's late here.