Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: Country Name Changes thru History

Expand Messages
  • vchromoho
    Subcarpathian Rus (aka Carpatho-Ruthenia ): http://www.rusyn.org/geosubcarpathian.html http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carpathian_Ruthenia Carpatho-Ukraine:
    Message 1 of 22 , Jun 3, 2007
    • 0 Attachment
      Subcarpathian Rus' (aka "Carpatho-Ruthenia"):
      http://www.rusyn.org/geosubcarpathian.html
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carpathian_Ruthenia

      Carpatho-Ukraine:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carpatho-Ukraine

      From the first link above:

      "In documents generated at the Paris Peace Conference in 1919 the
      formulation, "territory inhabited by Ruthenians south of the
      Carpathians," was used; in documents from this period produced by
      Rusyn-American immigrants the terms Subcarpathian Rus' and Rusinia
      appeared. It was Czechoslovakia's constitution (1920) which for the
      first time used as an official name Subcarpathian Rus' (Czech:
      Podkarpatska Rus), although in some Czech publications the term
      Rusinsko was employed. Subcarpathian Rus' referred, however, only to
      the new country's administrative unit, basically east of the Uzh
      river (eastern Uzh, Bereg, Ugocha, and Maramarosh counties). Other
      Rusyn-inhabited lands south of the Carpathians that fell under a
      Slovak provincial administration (in western Uzh, Zemplyn, Sharysh,
      and *Spish counties) gradually came to be known as the Preshovs'ka,
      Priashovs'ka Rus', or the *Presov Region. Ukrainian emigres who
      settled in Subcarpathian Rus' after 1919 used a wide range of names,
      including Pidkarpats'ka Rus' (Subcarpathian Rus'), Prykarpats'ka
      Ukraina (Ukraine near the Carpathians), Zakarpats'ka Ukraina
      (Ukraine beyond the Carpathians), Karpats'ka Ukraina (Carpatho-
      Ukraine), and even the vague term Sribna Zemlia (The Silver Land).
      After Czechoslovakia introduced a new territorial-administrative
      reform (July 1927) the republic was divided into four lands, the
      farthest east of which received the formal designation, Zeme
      podkarpatoruska (The Subcarpathian Land).

      When, on October 11, 1938, the province was given its own autonomous
      government, Subcarpathian Rus' became again the official name as
      entered into Czechoslovak constitutional law (November 22, 1938)."

      --- In Slovak-World@yahoogroups.com, "Gergely" <gergely@...> wrote:
      >
      > OK, thanks.
      > I'll try to find it.
      >
      > Jack Gergely
      > ----- Original Message -----
      > From: Plichta
      > To: Slovak-World@yahoogroups.com
      > Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2007 1:18 PM
      > Subject: [Slovak-World] Re: Country Name Changes thru History
      >
      >
      > Jack,
      >
      > The entire paragraph is a direct quote from "The Statesman's
      Yearbook",
      > Statistical and Historical Annual of the States of the World for
      the Year
      > 1975-1976, Edited by John Paxton, St. Martin's Press, New York,
      C 1975 The
      > Macmillan Press Ltd., p.851. The quote is from the History of
      > Czechoslovakia (Ceskoslovenska' Socialisticka' Republika). I
      would
      > recommend researching the treaty mentioned: The Treaty of St.
      > Germain-en-Layne (1919).
      >
      > Frank R. Plichta
      >
      > Galax, Virginia
      >
      > _____
      >
      > From: Slovak-World@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Slovak-
      World@yahoogroups.com] On
      > Behalf Of Gergely
      > Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2007 10:33 AM
      > To: Slovak-World@yahoogroups.com
      > Subject: [SPAM] Re: [Slovak-World] Re: Country Name Changes thru
      History
      >
      > Frank,
      >
      > Your use of "the autonomous province of Subcarpathian Ruthenia".
      This really
      > interests me. I'd like to know more.
      >
      > I was never aware that Ruthenia ever existed as a defined
      political area or
      > subdivision before. I always thought that Ruthenia (and all of
      the related
      > names) was an ethnic area.
      >
      > Do you, or anyone else, know when this was, what empire was it a
      province
      > of, and what territory did it encompass.
      >
    • Plichta
      ... Martin, I don t make stuff up. I can only report what I read in sources that are well respected and known for their historical accuracy. In The
      Message 2 of 22 , Jun 3, 2007
      • 0 Attachment
        >Austria was _not_ a republic during that time. _
        >Martin



        Martin,



        I don't make stuff up. I can only report what I read in sources that are
        well respected and known for their historical accuracy.



        In "The Statesman's YearBook" Edited by Brian Hunter, the 132nd Edition
        dated 1995-96, printed by St. Martin's Press, New York, it states on page
        156, under the article for Austria (Republik Oesterreich) and I quote
        directly: "History: Following the break-up of the Austro-Hungarian Empire,
        the Republic of Austria was proclaimed on 12 Nov. 1918." It then goes on to
        say that "On 12 March 1938 Austria was forcibly absorbed into Nazi Germany."



        If you are not familiar with "The Statesman's Yearbook" it is an annual
        publication, first published in 1864 and is used extensively as a primary
        reference source for diplomats around the world. The 2007 edition is the
        142nd year the reference has been published. From their website at:
        http://www.statesmansyearbook.com/public/about


        About The Statesman's Yearbook
        Dr Barry Turner, only the seventh editor in the 142-year history of The
        Statesman's Yearbook


        The Statesman's Yearbook was conceived of by Robert Carlyle and brought into
        being with the help of William Gladstone. Their vision for the book was an
        authoritative and accessible volume containing information essential for
        diplomats, politicians and all statesmen involved with international
        affairs. It quickly gained recognition as an indispensable reference tool
        and has been published continuously since 1864, through two world wars,
        without missing an edition. It was ranked by Library Journal as one of the
        top 20 best reference resources of the millennium.

        Today, international affairs concern almost every one of us and the scope of
        the book has become correspondingly broader, with expanded coverage of
        history, politics, economics, trade and infrastructure for each country, all
        thoroughly researched and verified by a dedicated editorial team. It also
        provides extensive further reading lists and web links for further research.

        In a world where opinion, propaganda and inaccuracy are frequently put
        forward as fact, The Statesman's Yearbook remains the first point of
        reference for anyone needing reliable, concise information on any country in
        the world.

        See the Reviews of The Statesman's
        <http://www.statesmansyearbook.com/public/reviews> Yearbook.



        Frank R. Plichta

        Galax, Virginia





        [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
      • Martin Votruba
        ... I did n-o-t quote you about that, Frank. You did not place the Republic of Austria in the 19th century. Another post did and I quoted that post about it,
        Message 3 of 22 , Jun 3, 2007
        • 0 Attachment
          > the Republic of Austria was proclaimed on 12 Nov. 1918."

          I did n-o-t quote you about that, Frank. You did not place the
          Republic of Austria in the 19th century. Another post did and I
          quoted that post about it, not yours.

          > the geographical area known as Galicia was a territory
          > within the political entity known as the Kingdom of Hungary.

          It never was.


          Martin

          votruba "at" pitt "dot" edu
        Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.