- SG places online media under strict licensing regime [image:Message 1 of 1 , Jun 3, 2013View Source
(1 Jun) – A NEW LICENSING SCHEME for online news in Singapore as triggered a tragic result: it is effectively extending the country’s strict regulation of news and public affairs information to its relatively freer online news media.
Singapore media on Monday, 28 May, reported that a fact sheet posted on the website of the Media Development Authority (MDA), announced that all online news media in the city state will henceforth come under a licensing regime.
In a statement, the Southeast Asian Press Alliance (SEAPA) noted that the MDA fact sheet explained that the new scheme gives online news media “a more consistent regulatory framework traditional news platforms” and “provides greater clarity on prevailing requirements” of the Singapore Broadcasting Act’s class license for internet service and content providers, and the Internet Code of Conduct.
SEAPA, a regional network of independent media organizations in the Philippines, Thailand, Indonesia, and Malaysia that includes the PCIJ as a founding member, noted though that the full text of the new online news licensing system had not yet been posted in the MDA website’s section on licenses as of Friday, 31 May, even as it is supposed to take effect beginning today, 1 June.
SEAPA reported that “Initially 10 news sites, including nine from mainstream media groups, have been listed as initial targets for licensing notifications from the MDA.”
The licensing system, SEAPA said, will cover all news websites that post “at least one article per week on Singaporeâ€™s news and current affairs” and “are visited by at least 50,000 unique IP [internet protocol] addresses” each month.
According to SEAPA, news platforms requiring licensing include those which provide “any news, intelligence, report of occurrence, or any matter of public interest, about any social, economic, political, cultural, artistic, sporting, scientific or any other aspect of Singapore in any language (whether paid or free and whether at regular interval or otherwise) but does not include any programme produced by or on behalf of the Government.”
“Presently, news sites are automatically licensed under the Broadcasting Act, with some groups required to register, including internet service providers, political parties, and individuals and groups providing programs on political and religious concerns in Singapore,” SEAPA said.
Under the new scheme, SEAPA added that the sites that fall within the two criteria will have to put up a performance bond of 50,000 SGD (about 40,000 USD) for an individual license.
However, “it is not clear if the scheme will require licensees to pay annual fees or how it will apply to popular news content providers from overseas meeting the criteria.”
Based on the fact sheet, SEAPA noted that, “licensing will require online news sites to obey MDAâ€™s directives to remove content within 24 hours if found to be in breach of content standards of Singapore.”
“The new license thus adds a degree of enforceability to the country’s Internet Code of Practice, which up to this point directed the content or service providers to use ‘best efforts to ensure that prohibited material is not broadcast via the Internet’,” SEAPA said.
Nonetheless, “the fact sheet did not clarify what due process guarantees exist, such as the role of judicial oversight, to protect possible infringements on the right to freedom of expression.”
SEAPA executive director Gayathry Venkiteswaran described the introduction of the online news licensing system as a “dangerous development which will further restrict press freedom in Singapore.”
Gayathry added that “Singapore authorities are likely targeting the alternative media in Singapore, which remains a vibrant space for news and views that are restricted in mainstream print and broadcast outlets.”
Singapore’s alternative media exists primarily online, she explained, since the mainstream media in the country is strictly regulated under the Newspapers and Printing Presses Act.
The country’s community of socio-political websites released a joint statement voicing concerns “about the impact of the newly-introduced requirement on fellow Singaporeans’ ability to receive diverse news information.”
Gayathry echoed concerns raised by the online community in Singapore that the new licensing scheme will unfairly affect voluntary and community-run websites, and the new system was introduced without public consultation.
SEAPA is the only regional organization with the specific mandate of promoting and protecting press freedom in Southeast Asia.
It is composed of the Jakarta-based Alliance of Independent Journalists (AJI) and the Institute for Studies on the Free Flow of Information (ISAI); the Manila-based Center for Media Freedom andResponsibility (CMFR) and Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism (PCIJ); the Bangkok-based Thai Journalists Association (TJA); and the network’s Kuala Lumpur-based associate member, the Centre for Independent Journalism (CIJ).
SEAPA also has partners in Cambodia, East Timor, and exiled Burmese media, and undertakes projects and programs for press freedom throughout the region.
.-->>>>>>>>>> TO HELP ME, COMPLETE THESE STATEMENTS, THANKS: http://roberthorequestforstatements.blogspot.com/My wife, an accountant, then a manager in an MNC drawing a 5-figure salary before she retired, can confirm that I write the Truth in all these. <<<<<<<<<<RH: LKY LHL WKS ELECTION RIGGINGS EMAILED TO ALMOST ENTIRE GOVT:
ME ON VIDEO DESCRIBING lky lhl wks NUMEROUS ELECTION RIGGINGS + PoBoB and CCTV Ideas:
MY ACQUAINTANCE, MR DAVID DUCLOS, A FORMER POLICE INSPECTOR, AND HIS LAWYER FRIEND, EYEWITNESSED LEE KUAN YEW RIGGING THE 1997 CHENG SAN GRC ELECTION. READ MORE AT MY BLOG ENTITLED "I CAME, I SAW, I SOLVED IT" :http://i-came-i-saw-i-solved-it.blogspot.com/
MY ONLINE POLICE REPORT ON LKY LHL WKS CHEATING ELECTIONS:
a. MY SWORN AFFIDAVIT OF 16 JULY 2010:
http://i-came-i-saw-i-solved-it.blogspot.com/2010/07/my-sworn-affidavit-of-16-july-2010.htmlb. SWORN EXHIBIT IN SUPPORT OF AFFIDAVIT:c. SOME LEGAL PRINCIPLES ON WHICH I GROUND MY CASE:d. THE PATTERN OF CRIMINAL WRONGDOINGS THAT PROVES MY CASE;e. 3rd EMAIL TO UK PM FOR OBSTRUCTING, PERVERTING JUSTICE:LEE Kuan Yew, LEE Hsien Loong, Tony TAN, HO Ching corruptions and theft of billions:
"POWERFUL POLITICIANS WHO CANNOT CREATE, INVENT, SOLVE PROBLEMS AND CHANGE THE WORLD CAN ONLY TAKE SATISFACTION BLOCKING, DEGRADING, THOSE WHO CAN."