Khaw cawing like an arrogant crow on AIM issue
You know when PAPpy leaders loose their cool. They will, like a particular Old Man, become very patronizing, arrogant and self-righteous in their words.
“This is self-righteous and – pardon me for saying so – arrogant. Many of us in this House have been serving Singaporeans for decades, long before she entered this House… Please, don’t behave as if you’re the only patriot in this House.”
- Khaw cawing like a crow, responding to Ms Sylvia Lim’s charge that the PAP was not concerned about residents but its own political interest.
Hey, Khaw, cut your darn bird crow crap. Your words sound very hollow indeed. You are there for the money and your career, not for the residents. Didn’t the PAP leadership proudly justify that ministers need to be paid highly to prevent them from being corrupted? Now you claim it is dedication? Stop cawing nonsense and stop contradicting your bosses.
Full report and rage from Caw Boon Wanna Win here - Govt, WP duel over town councils
And yes, Caw admits that Town Councils have a political slant.
In fact, the Town Council and GRCs are tools meant to be used by the PAP to make it difficult for opposition to enter Parliament. Wrote about that here - Birth of the GRC – history captured on video:
Summary of points on the video
- The GRC system was introduced after 1984 GE, when two opposition leaders, JBJ and Chiam were elected.
- Central to PAP’s argument was that the electorate voted along racial lines and the Malays needed help and hence, needed the GRC to aid a Malay MP into Parliament.
- Once again, the Malay race card is played up by the PAP, making them scapegoats in order to introduce this highly unpopular system.
- The opposition, like the rest of Singapore, knew that the real intent of the GRC system was meant to stymie the opposition votes, by diluting strong opposition wards with strong PAP wards.
- Take special note of LKY’s highly arrogant and condescending tone and manner, cutting off everyone else. Wasn’t this supposed to be a feedback session? Why then was LKY cutting off all feedback?
The answer is simple. The GRC system was already decided. The “feedback” was just a show.
The arrogance of Lee KY is at 8:33 min. See how he cuts people off.
Yep, Cawing Khaw Boon Wanna Win is just repeating Old Man Lee’s mannerisms, cutting off everyone. That’s what PAP leaders are. Arrogant and self-righteous.
Good work Sylvia! You certainly put the arrogant minister’s pants on fire.
* The writer blogs at http://wherebearsroamfree.blogspot.com/-->>>>>>>>>> TO HELP ME, COMPLETE THESE STATEMENTS, THANKS: http://roberthorequestforstatements.blogspot.com/My wife, an accountant, then a manager in an MNC drawing a 5-figure salary before she retired, can confirm that I write the Truth in all these. <<<<<<<<<<RH: LKY LHL WKS ELECTION RIGGINGS EMAILED TO ALMOST ENTIRE GOVT:
ME ON VIDEO DESCRIBING lky lhl wks NUMEROUS ELECTION RIGGINGS + PoBoB and CCTV Ideas:
MY ACQUAINTANCE, MR DAVID DUCLOS, A FORMER POLICE INSPECTOR, AND HIS LAWYER FRIEND, EYEWITNESSED LEE KUAN YEW RIGGING THE 1997 CHENG SAN GRC ELECTION. READ MORE AT MY BLOG ENTITLED "I CAME, I SAW, I SOLVED IT" :http://i-came-i-saw-i-solved-it.blogspot.com/
MY ONLINE POLICE REPORT ON LKY LHL WKS CHEATING ELECTIONS:
a. MY SWORN AFFIDAVIT OF 16 JULY 2010:
http://i-came-i-saw-i-solved-it.blogspot.com/2010/07/my-sworn-affidavit-of-16-july-2010.htmlb. SWORN EXHIBIT IN SUPPORT OF AFFIDAVIT:c. SOME LEGAL PRINCIPLES ON WHICH I GROUND MY CASE:d. THE PATTERN OF CRIMINAL WRONGDOINGS THAT PROVES MY CASE;e. 3rd EMAIL TO UK PM FOR OBSTRUCTING, PERVERTING JUSTICE:LEE Kuan Yew, LEE Hsien Loong, Tony TAN, HO Ching corruptions and theft of billions:
"POWERFUL POLITICIANS WHO CANNOT CREATE, INVENT, SOLVE PROBLEMS AND CHANGE THE WORLD CAN ONLY TAKE SATISFACTION BLOCKING, DEGRADING, THOSE WHO CAN."