2A1B is just stupidly following his Mentor's advice, which is to NEVER admit any mistake or apologise except that his Mentor Dad never had to deal with the Internet, ha3
The PAP-AIM saga has been brewing a tremendous storm that seems not to be abating in alternative media and coffeeshop talks. The relative silence of the MSM is deafening.
The abject professional failure of the MSM to carry the news objectively and fully to the people, as is the job of journalists, indirectly works in support of the alternative media. How is this so? As words go around between friends, between colleagues and in coffeeshops, and the defamation cases draw added curiosity over what is happening, people (thoughtful people and “kaypohs”) will naturally be hungry for more information. Where would they go and be recommended to go? Obviously, they would gravitate towards the alternative media and in quick time, the alternative media (TRE, Yawning Bread, etc.) grow in acceptance as a regular place to hang out. IS IT THE GOVERNMENT’S AIM FOR THIS TO HAPPEN?
The Government is composed of humans, and humans are normally very conscious of face. The world is watching. Neighbouring countries are noticing the festering wound on the Government’s reputation of efficiency in dealing with big and small issues. Supporters of PAP (even those in grassroots committees) who are all fellow citizens concerned for the PAP and for Singapore can’t be unaffected by the glaring inability of the Town Councils, AIM’s directors and Government Ministers to answer clear questions from the public. The longer it takes for the matter to drag on without closure, the bigger will be the chip-offs of confidence in the PAP. IS IT THE GOVERNMENT’S AIM FOR THIS TO HAPPEN?
In a court case, a defence lawyer who claims that there is no basis for a charge would very much muster all capabilities at his disposal to tear apart point by point all the assertions raised against his client. Thanks to the defence’s effort, the judge may rule the defendant innocent. In the AIM’s saga, lots and lots of questions have been asked by intelligent persons about the propriety of the TCs selling their developed software to a flimsy $2 company that is linked to PAP even if there is nothing illegal about it. There are many eminent present and past defence lawyers in the Government and in the PAP. Should they not stand out and help the Government and the Party to tear apart point by point all the assertions that PAP and AIM should not have been involved with each other in the sale and purchase of the developed TC’s application software, and that the tendering and tender-evaluation process should have been handled in better ways? Is it the Government’s AIM to bring closure to the case with a fabulous public judgment which will be in favour of the defendant’s nominated candidate/s at the Punggol East BE, the GE 2016 and the Presidential Election as faith is unequivocally restored to the PAP? IF THIS IS NOT THE GOVERNMENT’S AIM, WHAT IS?
I feel strongly that between those who strongly believe that the AIM’s case is a PAP mistake and those who strongly believe that it is a public misunderstanding of the PAP, there are certainly many who are presently standing in-between who are looking forward to the Government, the Town Councils, the company AIM, the PAP and the MSM to play their responsible parts to plainly, openly and unambiguously explain the matter to the public’s satisfaction. The end result may be either:
1) The Town Councils and AIM admit their mistakes made, show courage to undo the mistakes and thereby gain back the trust of TC residents, or
2) The Town Councils and AIM are exonerated and all who make the clamour in the alternative media hold their peace.
Or is it the Government’s AIM to let the festering saga dissolve by itself, no matter how long it takes and how it affects World Leaders’ (political and business) opinion of Singapore?
I wish to see things getting better, not getting worse with deferred problems for the Government and for Singapore.
Jo Li-->>>>>>>>>> TO HELP ME, COMPLETE THESE STATEMENTS, THANKS: http://roberthorequestforstatements.blogspot.com/My wife, an accountant, then a manager in an MNC drawing a 5-figure salary before she retired, can confirm that I write the Truth in all these. <<<<<<<<<<RH: LKY LHL WKS ELECTION RIGGINGS EMAILED TO ALMOST ENTIRE GOVT:
ME ON VIDEO DESCRIBING lky lhl wks NUMEROUS ELECTION RIGGINGS + PoBoB and CCTV Ideas:
MY ACQUAINTANCE, MR DAVID DUCLOS, A FORMER POLICE INSPECTOR, AND HIS LAWYER FRIEND, EYEWITNESSED LEE KUAN YEW RIGGING THE 1997 CHENG SAN GRC ELECTION. READ MORE AT MY BLOG ENTITLED "I CAME, I SAW, I SOLVED IT" :http://i-came-i-saw-i-solved-it.blogspot.com/
MY ONLINE POLICE REPORT ON LKY LHL WKS CHEATING ELECTIONS:
a. MY SWORN AFFIDAVIT OF 16 JULY 2010:
http://i-came-i-saw-i-solved-it.blogspot.com/2010/07/my-sworn-affidavit-of-16-july-2010.htmlb. SWORN EXHIBIT IN SUPPORT OF AFFIDAVIT:c. SOME LEGAL PRINCIPLES ON WHICH I GROUND MY CASE:d. THE PATTERN OF CRIMINAL WRONGDOINGS THAT PROVES MY CASE;e. 3rd EMAIL TO UK PM FOR OBSTRUCTING, PERVERTING JUSTICE:LEE Kuan Yew, LEE Hsien Loong, Tony TAN, HO Ching corruptions and theft of billions:
"THE PRIMAL FEAR OF A SUPERIOR MIND"