Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Biased reporting in the Straits Times

Expand Messages
  • furrybrowndog
    Biased reporting in the Straits Times with 3 comments I’m not
    Message 1 of 1 , May 30, 2012
    • 0 Attachment

      Biased reporting in the Straits Times

      with 3 comments

      I’m not sure what to make of counter protests by the Straits Times and its apologists that it reported the Hougang by-election coverage objectively and dispassionately. Yes those are the words used by the Straits Times editor in its reply to WP’s Low here. As previously written, when then MM Lee Kuan Yew slipped up under oath in 2008, the Straits Times could have spun the headline the same way it did for the by-election such as MM Lee made misstatement under oath, or as it did to WP even something like MM Lee faces allegations of perjury.

      But what did Straits Times choose to go with instead? A headline firmly on the MM and PAP’s side: Govt rebuts law group’s attack on S’pore judiciary. Why the inconsistency, Straits Times?

      A former Straits Times journalist curiously stated it isn’t just the opposition figures who complain about biased coverage. Apparently the PAP does too, and no less by heavyweight ministers:

      Lest people think that only the opposition complains about headlines, well, the PAP does too but maybe not as publicly. I don’t know about this by-election or even the last general election, but I’ve had to face the ire of PAP heavyweights who complain about unflattering pictures or supposedly misleading headlines during past polls or the amount of acreage given to the opposition. Yes, the PAP complains too about media bias.

      Then the question here is, why doesn’t the Straits Times make such complaints and their dealings public? Why couldn’t the editor make a decision to publish the content of the PAP complaints together with its editor’s replies and let the public make their own judgement as to whether the Straits Times was consistent and fair in their election coverage? Must it be settled behind closed doors over hushed whispers? As though the Straits Times are politically subservient to the PAP?

      Photo choice and placement is another issue. As noted by another blogger here, it’s quite telling that the Straits Times tended to portray Desmond Choo together with his constituents, but of Png simply campaigning for votes.

      Let’s review a couple more recent instances of biased articles from the Straits Times. Earlier this year there was this: Did Singaporeans over-react to MRT breakdowns? The article suggests that Singaporeans went over the top in demanding that then-SMRT CEO Saw Phaik Hwa resign after train service broke down repeatedly in December 2011. But something surprising happened less than a week later which vindicated those calling for Saw’s resignation: Saw actually resigned. What happened, Straits Times? If Singaporeans were indeed complaining as the spoilt brats they were made out to be, why did Saw have to resign?

      Or take this example from earlier this January, where the Straits Times declared that President Tony Tan volunteers to take 51% pay cut. Volunteer? Why couldn’t the headline have been written as President Tan accepts pay cut recommendations? Why the need to spin it as a selfless gesture on Tony Tan’s part?

      However ST apologists want to spin it, it becomes very hard to deny that the Straits Times is biased in its reporting and coverage through selective use of headlines, photo choice and placement.

      Like this:

      Be the first to like this post.

      Written by defennder

      May 30, 2012 at 8:48 PM

      3 Responses

      Subscribe to comments with RSS.

      1. The fact The Straits Times (and all other SPH newspapers for that matter) is biased is undeniable. The only area for possible dispute is how baised they are!!

        The denials by editors of ST and Lianhe Zaobao are futile because their past reportings are ample proof that they serve PAP.

        Gatecrash

        May 31, 2012 at 10:50 AM

      2. We have decided to allow access to full stories published in Straits Times to non-subscribers starting 1st June 2012.
        Please bookmark the three links shown by http://i.imgur.com/vmaVr.png

        Links to the various sections of Straits Time are the bottom of the destination page.
        Links to full stories are in this format http://www.straitstimes.com/vgn-ext-templating/v/index.jsp?vgnextoid=%5BCODE%5D&vgnextchannel=%5BCODE%5D

      3. These are not the only lapses and evidence for biased reporting by these self-proclaimed ‘professional journalists’ trying to be politically neutral:

        1) When some PAP bigwig claims that S$1k could sustain the purchase of a HDB flat – the very next day, the ST had this on the headlines. The report was also biased as it did not take into account the various other expenses a family might require besides a place to stay (e.g., CPF for retirement). Objective reporting? Hardly.

        2) When some PAP bigwig claims that Hougang BE result did not reflect the political sentiments of Singapore on the whole – loh and behold, an ST editor (with insufficient originality) regurgitates the same idea in a ST column.

        3) I know someone had actually done an empirical study on this and posted it online but we all know this to be true – in GE2011, compare the press space deovated to PAP candidates with that of non-PAP candidates. Pages and pages devoted to PAP candidates like they were pop idols.

        4) The recent picture illustrating the PAP accusations of WP being dishonest – of ALL pictures featuring LTK, Slyvia and Png in their various activities, ST had to feature one that smacks of dishonest inneuendoes – did you think the public did not get this ‘below-the-waist’ cheapshot? What is ST but some small city newsletter of the PAP that resorts to such gutter journalism?

        Up your standards further ST – you have alot to make a case for yourself as politically neutral and objective. Talk is cheap. If I were a ST journalist, I would be ashamed of myself for disgracing the profession. Really. Unless of course, you did not know what being objective truly means.


      --
      >>>>>>>>>>  TO HELP ME, COMPLETE THESE STATEMENTS, THANKS:  http://roberthorequestforstatements.blogspot.com/

      My wife, an accountant, then a manager in an MNC drawing a 5-figure salary before she retired, can confirm that I write the Truth in all these.  <<<<<<<<<<

      RH:   LKY LHL WKS ELECTION RIGGINGS EMAILED TO ALMOST ENTIRE GOVT:
      http://i-came-i-saw-i-solved-it.blogspot.com/2010/06/lky-lhl-wks-election-riggings-emailed.html

      ME ON VIDEO DESCRIBING lky lhl wks NUMEROUS ELECTION RIGGINGS + PoBoB and CCTV Ideas:
      http://i-came-i-saw-i-solved-it.blogspot.com/search/label/%22A%20Video%20RH%20on%20LKY%20LHL%20WKS%20cheating%20elections%20%2B%20PoBoB%20and%20CCTV%20Ideas%22

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jQCab3QZbBk

      MY ACQUAINTANCE, MR DAVID DUCLOS, A FORMER POLICE INSPECTOR, AND HIS LAWYER FRIEND, EYEWITNESSED LEE KUAN YEW RIGGING THE 1997 CHENG SAN GRC ELECTION.  READ MORE AT MY BLOG ENTITLED "I CAME, I SAW, I SOLVED IT" : 

      b.  SWORN EXHIBIT IN SUPPORT OF AFFIDAVIT:

      c.  SOME LEGAL PRINCIPLES ON WHICH I GROUND MY CASE:

      d.  THE PATTERN OF CRIMINAL WRONGDOINGS THAT PROVES MY CASE;

      e.  3rd EMAIL TO UK PM FOR OBSTRUCTING, PERVERTING JUSTICE:

      "THE PRIMAL FEAR OF A SUPERIOR MIND"

    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.