Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.
 

Asset Rich, Cash Poor

Expand Messages
  • hardhitting
    Musings From the Lion City Monday, March 29, 2010 Asset Rich, Cash
    Message 1 of 1 , Mar 28, 2010

      Monday, March 29, 2010

      Asset Rich, Cash Poor

      At a forum organized by the Singapore government’s feedback unit, REACH, Singapore Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said that there is a growing trend of elderly home-owners who sold their flats to pay off debts and then asked the government for a rental unit. The PM said that the government is concerned and keeping a close eye on the matter.

      Now the Singapore assumption is that your property is an asset for one’s old age and to most Singaporeans, a property is a must. However in this case, I disagree with the PM’s suggestion that elderly home-owners should not sell their flats.

      One of the biggest problems of Singaporeans is that they are asset rich but cash poor, and I think most Singaporeans will agree that their wealth is tied up in their property. Now at the risk of being dry, I will get into some numbers. Take for example an elderly person who sells his flat and bought a new flat like the PM want and make $40,000 in profit (a solid number I think). What happen then?

      Assuming his daily expenses is on the low side of about $10 (breakfast, lunch, dinner, etc), he would have spent $3,650 per year. In 10 years time, the money would be gone! Would he not still be in the same position he is now about having to sell his flat again?

      Yes, because getting a job is not an option as the PM himself said, the person is elderly. How would a 60+, 70+ person find a job in Singapore? If you are an employer, would you pick a 70+ Singaporean or a 20+ foreign worker?

      And that’s for an elderly person; if it is an “elderly couple? the money would be gone twice as fast and they would be in the same position in just 5 years time!

      However that is not what I am really disagreeing about. What I truly disagree is this thinking that elderly Singaporeans should not sell their flats. Why?

      We have foreigners coming in to Singapore to speculate on the property markets, but elderly Singaporeans (who made Singapore what it is now) should NOT sell their flats?

      What kind of sense is that? PM Lee said this goes against the aim of these homes as assets for life, but the thing is; if you are 70+, how many more years do you have? If these elderly people can’t sell their flats at this age, then when can they sell the flats? If you are 70+, you will be less worried about the asset that is the flat and more worried about if you have the money to eat.

      Sell the flat, get a rental unit for $50-$100 per month so that daily expenses would not be a problem. That makes perfect sense to me. In contrast, the PM’s floated idea of keeping the flat makes no sense to me. What’s the use of keeping the flat when you have debts and even have problems finding the money to eat? It’s not like Singapore has any welfare programs for the elderly.

      Now I understand the PM’s idea of the flat being an asset for life. However at 60-70 years of age, being asset rich is less important than being cash rich and I truly feel giving these rental flats to these elderly is the right thing to do.

      After all, what choice do they have? If they keep the flat, they would be chased by the debt-collectors and might have problem to put food on the table. Compare that to the solution of selling and getting a rental flat, it’s hardly even a choice.

      Posted by Ghost
      at 1:05 AM

      --
      RH: ?ME ON VIDEO DESCRIBING lky lhl wks NUMEROUS ELECTION RIGGINGS:
      http://i-came-i-saw-i-solved-it.blogspot.com/search/label/%22A%20Video%20RH%20on%20LKY%20LHL%20WKS%20cheating%20elections%22

      MY ACQUAINTANCE, MR DAVID DUCLOS, A FORMER POLICE INSPECTOR, AND HIS LAWYER FRIEND, EYEWITNESSED LEE KUAN YEW RIGGING THE 1997 CHENG SAN GRC ELECTION.  READ MORE AT MY BLOG ENTITLED "I CAME, I SAW, I SOLVED IT" :
      http://i-came-i-saw-i-solved-it.blogspot.com/

      MY ONLINE POLICE REPORT ON LKY LHL WKS CHEATING ELECTIONS:
      http://i-came-i-saw-i-solved-it.blogspot.com/2009/06/police-report-lee-ky-lhl-wks-cheating_02.html

      THE MOST COMPLETE RUBBISHING OF LEEconomics EVER:
      http://i-came-i-saw-i-wrote-it.blogspot.com/2009/06/most-complete-rubbishing-of-leeconomics.html

      [ALSO AT THE ABOVE BLOG, LIE KUAN YEW's LIES, CORRUPTION, WRONGFUL JAILING, TORTURE AND BEATING TO DEATH OF INNOCENT POLITICAL PRISONERS LIKE MR CHAN HOCK HUA]

      READ ALSO MARTYN SEE's INTERVIEW WITH ME AT:
      http://singaporerebel.blogspot.com/

      ALSO AT:
      http://i-came-i-saw-i-wrote-it.blogspot.com/2007/03/filmmaker-martyn-see-interviews-robert.html

      FOR QUICK, IRREVERENT REASONS WHY LIE KY DESERVES A NOBEL:
      http://i-came-i-saw-i-solved-it.blogspot.com/search/label/Not%20nominated%20for%20a%20Nobel%20so%20LIE%20KY%20gives%20himself%20many%20others

      MY ARCHIVE OF WORKS AT:
      http://i-came-i-saw-i-wrote-it.blogspot.com/

      PHOTOS OF LIE KY SCRATCHING MY WIFE's NEW CAR:
      http://i-came-i-saw-i-solved-it.blogspot.com/search/label/LIE%20KY%20scratched%20my%20car%20S%242800%20to%20repair

      NOT GUILTY BUT TORTURED, DEGRADED 15 YEARS FOR PUBLICITY, FUN
      http://i-came-i-saw-i-solved-it.blogspot.com/2009/05/not-guilty-but-tortured-degraded-15.html

      WHY SINGAPORE HAS NO ECONOMY
      http://i-came-i-saw-i-solved-it.blogspot.com/2009/10/why-singapore-has-no-economy.html
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.